And to keep the thread on-topic, I've directed very small amateur short films, with a varying level of professional equipment. I may decide to study filmmaking in the future, and then things'll get interesting

I'd go with Avid for the reason Beowulf mentioned.Greggus1 wrote:Was going to make a new topic, but might as well ask here : With Avid Xpress Pro and Final Cut Express going for 300 bucks each, which do you recommend?
I'm still an amature. I started making AMVs because it looked like fun and an editing program came with my DVD burner.Douggie wrote: But you know what I'm wondering - if you do something related to film (editing) - if the interest comes from editing AMV's first or the reversed way - because the first experience can influence the latter.
then your going to go with final cut. As much as I hate avid, it does has its usefullness, however if you want a more stable, easier, and "more functional" program then you want final cut.Greggus1 wrote:Thanks alot, but besides the professional usefulness of it, which is just the better program?
Never used Final Cut myself, only Avid so I can't tell you.ssj4lonewolf wrote:then your going to go with final cut. As much as I hate avid, it does has its usefullness, however if you want a more stable, easier, and "more functional" program then you want final cut.Greggus1 wrote:Thanks alot, but besides the professional usefulness of it, which is just the better program?
On a side note the older version of liquid(like 2.0 or somthing, before avid bought it out) is better than both of them.