
Quick coments
- staces
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 12:53 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
- dj_ultima_the_great
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 7:52 pm
- Status: Resident Videogame Editor
- Location: Wisconsin
Yes, Zarx. I am reading what he says, but you know what? Some people are just jackasses. For them, insulting Dalto is the same as insulting his video. It does suck, and I feel sorry for him - really I do - but that's the way it is. Some people don't know how to use "I" language. They only know "you" language. I do agree with your second thought, though. Dalto, it's best not to let it get to you. Some folks just don't differentiate between video and creator very well. Besides, chances are at least one of them is godix, so you shouldn't take 'em too seriously.Zarxrax wrote:Are you reading what he says? They are not speaking badly of his videos. People are merely using the form to leave insults towards him as a person.
In my opinion.. just ignore it. If people want to say things like that then who cares? You are the only one who sees it, so just don't let it bother you.

I also agree with the idea of a delete function for the comments. I mean, think of something like Euphoria. I can't imagine how many QC's that thing must have by now. It'd be nice for Koop to be able to get rid of the "AWESOME" comments and just keep the constructive criticism - not that his video needs any more, but roll with me here. I'm just using it as an example, since pretty much everyone knows that video. The same applies to pretty much any creator. Yeah, the "k1ck@$$!" comments are nice, but they just add up to clutter.
Dalto - do you think something like that would help maybe?
All in all, I'm still opposed to adding names in, and I always will be. Refer to my first post for the reasons why.
- Jen
-
- is
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
- Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
- Location: N????????????????
- godix
- a disturbed member
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 12:13 am
Just for the record I don't think I've commented on one of dalto's vids. Yet. If his 'god called in sick today' video makes me sick this will probably change.dj_ultima_the_great wrote:Besides, chances are at least one of them is godix, so you shouldn't take 'em too seriously.
I don't think anyone needs to waste time coding in deleting quick comments. Treat them like ops, if you don't want to hear how badly you suck then don't read the damned things.
- whiteash
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 1:20 am
Alright.
If you don't want to hear how badly you suck then don't read the damned things? Alright... let's not have them at all then, because if I want to read good QCs about my videos and a ton of really offensive flames show up, I have no choice, now do I?
My recent videos have come under unfriendly fire without decent explanation. I find my videos to be decent, perhaps the earlier ones not so much... but as of late, my better videos have been receiving hurtful QC which I have no means of tracking.
I would like this site to remove the QC option unless we can track those who abuse it by leaving flames.
Well if I'm getting flamed it's obvious because my videos suck? No, I'm sorry. Many of them could be better, but I was a beginner when they were poor and I've been improving, just as everyone does.
There is no excuse for some of the tripe getting flung at me.
I have left you with QCs left on my videos. This alone should be reason enough to edit the QC option.
QCs:
""one-trick pony. noun: any person or group with only one discernable trait, talent, or area of expertise. Example: Whiteash is a one-trick pony video editor. And it's a very bad one trick pony.""
""They were not given power to kill them, but only to torture them for five months. And the agony they suffered was like that of the sting of a scorpion when it strikes a man. [Revelations 9:5]""
""oh god it was horrible""
""hate it""
""I found this video to be like having sex with a 90 year old great grandma. Some might find it fun but I found it rather distrubing, sick, and one of the ugliest things I've ever seen.""
""I've taken shits that were more entertaining.""
""This video is like my last acid trip. No matter where I turn I see horrible images drug from the bowels of hell and hear sounds that make fingernails on a chalkboard sound like Mozart in comparison. After just a few minutes of it I end up wrapped around the toilet covered in my own puke screaming 'oh dear god, just let me die please'.""
""uhmm... eh i dont know""
""sucked""
""crap""
""You know the saying that if you let 1000 monkeys bang on 1000 keyboards for 1000 years that they'll produce the entire works of shakespeare? This video would take 10 monkeys fling shit at a monitor for about 5 minutes to reproduce.""
My recent videos have come under unfriendly fire without decent explanation. I find my videos to be decent, perhaps the earlier ones not so much... but as of late, my better videos have been receiving hurtful QC which I have no means of tracking.
I would like this site to remove the QC option unless we can track those who abuse it by leaving flames.
Well if I'm getting flamed it's obvious because my videos suck? No, I'm sorry. Many of them could be better, but I was a beginner when they were poor and I've been improving, just as everyone does.
There is no excuse for some of the tripe getting flung at me.
I have left you with QCs left on my videos. This alone should be reason enough to edit the QC option.
QCs:
""one-trick pony. noun: any person or group with only one discernable trait, talent, or area of expertise. Example: Whiteash is a one-trick pony video editor. And it's a very bad one trick pony.""
""They were not given power to kill them, but only to torture them for five months. And the agony they suffered was like that of the sting of a scorpion when it strikes a man. [Revelations 9:5]""
""oh god it was horrible""
""hate it""
""I found this video to be like having sex with a 90 year old great grandma. Some might find it fun but I found it rather distrubing, sick, and one of the ugliest things I've ever seen.""
""I've taken shits that were more entertaining.""
""This video is like my last acid trip. No matter where I turn I see horrible images drug from the bowels of hell and hear sounds that make fingernails on a chalkboard sound like Mozart in comparison. After just a few minutes of it I end up wrapped around the toilet covered in my own puke screaming 'oh dear god, just let me die please'.""
""uhmm... eh i dont know""
""sucked""
""crap""
""You know the saying that if you let 1000 monkeys bang on 1000 keyboards for 1000 years that they'll produce the entire works of shakespeare? This video would take 10 monkeys fling shit at a monitor for about 5 minutes to reproduce.""
- godix
- a disturbed member
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 12:13 am
The org isn't here to boost your ego and it isn't here to protect you from the harsh world. People can and do say they don't like your videos. Either deal with it or don't read the QCs.
Besides, your problem isn't with QCs. If someone wanted they could tell you that you suck in an opinion, a PM, a forum message, or email. And those are just the easy ways of doing it, I'm sure I could think of more exotic methods if I tried Coming soon, Dedicated to whiners. Your problem is that you just want to hear how great you are and don't like it if someone dares disagree, not the QC system.
Besides, your problem isn't with QCs. If someone wanted they could tell you that you suck in an opinion, a PM, a forum message, or email. And those are just the easy ways of doing it, I'm sure I could think of more exotic methods if I tried Coming soon, Dedicated to whiners. Your problem is that you just want to hear how great you are and don't like it if someone dares disagree, not the QC system.
- whiteash
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 1:20 am
That's not it at all. I want to hear constructive criticism if people think I can improve. Constructive means I get helpful feedback on how to improve. I have problems with useless insults that don't help me at all.godix wrote: Your problem is that you just want to hear how great you are and don't like it if someone dares disagree, not the QC system.
- Zaphod_Beeblebrox
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:45 am
- Location: Somewhere... but not here.
Oh stop bitching, at least this means people are actually downloading your vids, even if they do think they suck...and besides, if you want constructive criticism you should just go the op exchange forum and do something about it there.whiteash wrote:That's not it at all. I want to hear constructive criticism if people think I can improve. Constructive means I get helpful feedback on how to improve. I have problems with useless insults that don't help me at all.godix wrote: Your problem is that you just want to hear how great you are and don't like it if someone dares disagree, not the QC system.
- whiteash
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 1:20 am
I'm sorry... "bitching"? I have a valid reason for my "bitching" thanks. My videos have been seriously undermined by insults and I have every right to be upset. This does not qualify as bitching as I have explained my anger. If you cannot differentiate, that is your own problem.Zaphod_Beeblebrox wrote:Oh stop bitching, at least this means people are actually downloading your vids, even if they do think they suck...and besides, if you want constructive criticism you should just go the op exchange forum and do something about it there.whiteash wrote:That's not it at all. I want to hear constructive criticism if people think I can improve. Constructive means I get helpful feedback on how to improve. I have problems with useless insults that don't help me at all.godix wrote: Your problem is that you just want to hear how great you are and don't like it if someone dares disagree, not the QC system.
Plus, this is a forum topic about Quick Comments. I have every right to talk about QCs here. Thanks. You can go now.