Latest from Deranged Kreationz

DrngdKreationz · Post by **DrngdKreationz** » Thu May 06, 2004 9:47 am

Sorry to tell you but I don't even have that book. as for the horrible field problem that was a mistake i made during earlier problems importing a draft exported as divX which i never got corrected.

sorry if you don't like it. but don't go assuming where i get my ideas from.

Bote · Post by **Bote** » Thu May 06, 2004 10:18 am

*eats Corran's bandwidth*

Props. for the DIRECT dewd. I don't wanna dld on LOCAL since it always breaks

*smashes dial-up*

Be back with the review in a month

.

rubyeye · Post by **rubyeye** » Thu May 06, 2004 11:15 am

DrngdKreationz wrote:Sorry to tell you but I don't even have that book. as for the horrible field problem that was a mistake i made during earlier problems importing a draft exported as divX which i never got corrected.

sorry if you don't like it. but don't go assuming where i get my ideas from.

Was NME trying to comment on it's "crappy unoriginality" or something. I don't get it.

Anyway, doesn't matter where you get your ideas from, even if it's an exercise from a book. I've seen those same effects used in tv commercials, why do you think those techniques are sold in a book? Because they work.

Great video btw.

TobinHood · Post by **TobinHood** » Thu May 06, 2004 12:03 pm

Boss video man, not usually my particular style of vid but for some reason it sold me. I believe all the obvious problems were already emntion but don't let a few interlacing problems get you down, some of my favorite videos are 20x shittier quality that this video.

*Oh God, now I'm starting that

thing without even knowing it*

Knù¢klés · Post by **Knù¢klés** » Thu May 06, 2004 12:54 pm

Pure Ownage

Joykiller · Post by **Joykiller** » Thu May 06, 2004 12:56 pm

NME wrote:Effects taken straight from AE classroom in a book 6.0

Ok I, for one, *DO* own that book, and I can say without a doubt that the lesson(s) that deal with the hexagons doesn't even get you 1/4 of the way to doing what you are showing in that screenshot. scaling 10 white hexagons and keyframing their opacity != that screentshot, nor does creating a 'hallway' of little semi-opaque hexagons.

Hell the book doesn't even go over how to have footage display on the hexagons or any other still image for that matter. (unless you consider tint and blur to be footage 0_o), So I don't fully understand where you're getting that shit from. And I did a little research and discoverd that Adobe didn't invent the hexagon. Imagine that!!! Hell they didn't even create the idea of rendering a project in 3d space! >:0 But obviously hexagons in a RahXephon video is just so fucking rare that it woud HAVE to be jacked from a book right? RIGHT??

Not that any of that matters, you're snip was assignine requardless. The Premiere 6 CIAB goes over plenty of effects that are used in practically every single video I download. I'm not gonna waste my time pissing all over people based on that.

As for the combing, I agree that it looks like shit. You got no argument from me there. But honestly I didn't feel that it fucked the entire video up... Plus I do understand what would likely be involved in correcting that, and it just wouldn't be worth all the time. Furthermore it's pretentious to even come off like the image quality of your videos is so pristine that anything less then perfect is an insult, and must be disposed of. I've never talked to anyone that hasn't had some form of interlacing in at least one of the videos they've made.

But whatever, that's just my $.02.

There are better ways of telling someone that you have little or no appreciation for their art than posting belligerent flames in their announcment threads.

- 'what a concept!'

I think the video is awesome. I don't deny there are minor things wrong with it, but even considering that, it's awesome. I think it's at the very least worth the time required to download it. Easily one of the best AMV's I've ever seen. And the HQ version really does the 3D parts justice.

Bote · Post by **Bote** » Thu May 06, 2004 3:02 pm

Joykiller wrote:I think it's at the very least worth the time required to download it. Easily one of the best AMV's I've ever seen. And the HQ version really does the 3D parts justice.

I sure hope those 4h will pay off.

NME · Post by **NME** » Thu May 06, 2004 3:14 pm

I like how I make an ironic post about hexagons and no one understands it.

AMV_4000 · Post by **AMV_4000** » Thu May 06, 2004 5:04 pm

Joykiller wrote:
NME wrote:Effects taken straight from AE classroom in a book 6.0

Ok I, for one, *DO* own that book, and I can say without a doubt that the lesson(s) that deal with the hexagons doesn't even get you 1/4 of the way to doing what you are showing in that screenshot. scaling 10 white hexagons and keyframing their opacity != that screentshot, nor does creating a 'hallway' of little semi-opaque hexagons. Hell the book doesn't even go over how to have footage display on the hexagons or any other still image for that matter. (unless you consider tint and blur to be footage 0_o), So I don't fully understand where you're getting that shit from. And I did a little research and discoverd that Adobe didn't invent the hexagon. Imagine that!!! Hell they didn't even create the idea of rendering a project in 3d space! >:0 But obviously hexagons in a RahXephon video is just so fucking rare that it woud HAVE to be jacked from a book right? RIGHT??

Not that any of that matters, you're snip was assignine requardless. The Premiere 6 CIAB goes over plenty of effects that are used in practically every single video I download. I'm not gonna waste my time pissing all over people based on that.

As for the combing, I agree that it looks like shit. You got no argument from me there. But honestly I didn't feel that it fucked the entire video up... Plus I do understand what would likely be involved in correcting that, and it just wouldn't be worth all the time. Furthermore it's pretentious to even come off like the image quality of your videos is so pristine that anything less then perfect is an insult, and must be disposed of. I've never talked to anyone that hasn't had some form of interlacing in at least one of the videos they've made.

But whatever, that's just my $.02. There are better ways of telling someone that you have little or no appreciation for their art than posting belligerent flames in their announcment threads. - 'what a concept!'

I think the video is awesome. I don't deny there are minor things wrong with it, but even considering that, it's awesome. I think it's at the very least worth the time required to download it. Easily one of the best AMV's I've ever seen. And the HQ version really does the 3D parts justice.

Im officially scared that the ToRnAdO's gunna sneak up on me and give me a EuPhOrIa!

I CANT TAKE... ANY MORE...

...i must be dreaming...

GET IT AWAY!

AMV_4000 · Post by **AMV_4000** » Thu May 06, 2004 5:20 pm

OMGWTS???
thats the worst thing i've ever seen (and i just finished watching Spice World)... i never thought i would say this..but that was worse then euphoria.. you make me wanna watch euhporia now.. thats terrible.. its like... Hey, i just found Trackmatte! Lets make flashy triangles and Octagons and hexagons, and Everything that euphoria almost had, lets make SURE no one can listen to this sone EVER AGAIN, or watch Euphoria the series EVERY again... i pity you.. but.. that is going in my hate video none the lesss.....