Judging in contests is subjective and really depends on the people's tastes and preferences. It's not 100% reliable and there are some editors who have taken full advantage of pandering to judges' personal favorites to earn their votes to qualify for the contest, if not to ensure they win altogether.
I now you stated that this is different from complaining about pandering to judges to win, but it is a factor on the issue you are addressing. It hurts what can potentially be a friendly competition between editors and limits the chances of more ambitious creators from being noticed for stepping outside the general “norm” of amv editing. It also sends the wrong message to newer editors and convinces them to just make what's popular so that THEY can become popular as well.
This is what I agree with the most. Because of the rising desire to win contests and making only what is popular to guarantee popularity, amv editing is becoming more monotonous. And because of that the community itself is becoming less involved and more of an obligation. It's less about getting to know other creators and sharing ideas with each other and more about dropping a video in the announcement thread and looking for contests to enter.seasons wrote:There's been no shortage of threads about how the hobby is dying or how the org is dying... the only thing that seems to be dying is the idea of editing AMVs for their own sake.
There still are a lot of editors who make amvs for the sake of expressing their joy and appreciation for their favorite shows/movies. They haven't died out, they just became less involved with the community because they don't want to lose interest in something they love to do. And the rising desire for more competition does turn people off from the hobby. I for one can attest to that, and I struggle with that every time I start a new video.