Tono_Fyr wrote: /v\ajin Koji one rookie of the year one year and he didn't even like the video that won it for him. In my oppinion, that's the perfect example.
???
Was that on this website? Koji was nominated for that, but it wasn't because of a single video - it was his entire collection that made him stand out as one of the aspiring new creators for 2003. Bt actually won that award. >.>
Not so perfect example? ^_^; You could use DW's 'Evolution' instead - he compains about it all the time now, even though it did very well(convention amv contests) and remains a highly popular video.
You should never be completely satisfied with your work, because if you just stay satisified, while you may get better, you might not ever reach your full potential.
If you're a First Grader and you write your first page in cursive, shouldn't you be satisfied that you've done as good as you can for your experience? That doesn't stop you from improving as your experience grows. You do what you know you can do and be happy that you did your best. Never being satisfied - even when you did the best you could at that time - leads to nothing but depression and eventually quitting altogether.
If you know what you can do, you can be satisfied with a video and then go on to do something far beyond it and be satisfied with that, too, because just like the first one, it's the best you could do at that time. People improve, and even when you look back at an old video and wince, you can still be satisfied that it was the best you could have done back then.
People who say "This AMV of mine sucks" say it because they know it's the truth, and I feel that this is what will drive them to improve. That's just my oppinion, anyways.
Not arguing with that at all - for some it may be true. I know people who win contests and turn around and cry that they suck so badly - because the reverse psychology keeps them pushing themselves to improve. Eventually they crack, but on the way there, they tend to get even better than they were to start with.
Me, I think most people who say "this video sucks" are warning away those who don't bother to check the creator's profile and see what his experience is before they start flaming the newb. I've put warnings on some of my worst vids - so people who need "this for it to be good" won't waste their time. It doesn't mean I don't like the video myself. The vid description is to warn or invite or educate the would-be viewers.
So yes, if you see "this vid sucks" and choose not to download it, that's probably for the best. You're the sort of person that creator knows won't like his video. Others will look at that description and see "I'm not good yet, so be gentle and helpfull please" and download it for entirely different reasons. The "this vid sucks" is a warning, it just depends on how you take it.