

First video.






So many problems, I know, I just wanted to learn the software and get some feedback. Thanks.
Yeah, I've tried to tweak it. That last verse in particular runs way too long, and I had trouble cleanly cutting the audio because of everything going on with the song. I didn't have any good ideas on where to go to end it after the duel but didn't want to just chop it off - though maybe it'd be better with just a fadeout?meleechampion wrote:I really like the foreboding feeling of the song and the buildup, but after the fight it seems... I dunno, bland.
Yeah... still figuring out how to do that, particularly in motion shots. But there's parts that are really bad.meleechampion wrote:Code mentioned it, but you'd really would get a better video if you cut down on the lip flap.
meleechampion wrote:I like the style and I liked the scene selection, and I liked the storytelling, even if I didn't quite understand it. Nice job.
Wow, thanks!Code wrote:Even as is, it has an interesting flow and interesting editing.
Code wrote:Oh, and it's not a crime to use more than one episode.
purplepolecat wrote:Loved it. Especially for a first video, this showed real flair. The composition and scene selection were lovely, and there were some really well thought out sync moments, particularly when the music changed pace. The editing kinda ran out of steam around the 4:00 mark though.
I fought with that more than anything before I realized I had ripped my source DVDs with the wrong pixel ratio. If there's an easy way to get Vegas to crop or resize instead of letterbox, I'd be all over it.purplepolecat wrote:In addition to the technical nitpicks above, aspect ratio is slightly off, 4:3 TV shows should be 640x480.
Will do!purplepolecat wrote:Other than that, good job, keep 'em coming !
Yeah, I was really unhappy with the quality of the preview render and YouTube output, probably from rendering to WMV. It also looked like I had uploaded an older render to YT in a subconscious attempt to make every possible newbie mistake.qyll wrote:D'oh, you removed the video.
I'm reencoding my sources as I write this, lesson learned.Kionon wrote:Aspect ratio, aspect ratio, aspect ratio. Utena is Standard Definition 4:3. This means you should release your video in 640x480. You have it in 720x480. This is fine, if you set a flag (which tells the player to show it in 4;3), but increases filesize. Without a flag, everything looks flattened.
I can tell encoding is going to be the bane of my existence.Kionon wrote:Encode. You have some issues during fades and high action scenes with macroblocking (big pixels you can see). This means you haven't found the optimum bitrate to handle the high motion scenes. I hate for you to have to replace it again, but between encode and aspect ratio, you should produce another copy.
I ripped a second MPEG2 version without the logo or bumper for contest submissions, and I'll see if I can get it up on sendspace and add an indirect link. But I'll keep that in mind for future vids, thanks.Kionon wrote:I am not a fan of MTV style credits, for both personal and practical reasons. I personally think they look bad. Practically, you can not submit videos to certain cons if they have MTV style credits. It is much better to have credits before and after, that you can remove for blind contests. It also makes sure that, in my opinion, the video looks cleaner and your viewer is not distracted.
Still working on my techniques for reducing this. There was quite a bit of frame redistribution in the first version and more masking in the newest one. Can you point me to any resources that help me out with overlays and masking in Vegas Pro 9, especially in scenes with motion?Kionon wrote:Lip flap. Mentioned by others, there is simply too much of it in this video. It is distracting, and for this song especially, does not fit. Utena offers plenty of scene choices where lip flap is not an issue. There are also ways you can eliminate lip flap be creative frame redistribution or even clips using overlays of closed mouths that can eliminate lip flap from significant portions of a given scene.
I just realized that before I read your post, too, when I decided to caption the beginning for YouTube and saw how distracting the whole thing was. And my rationalization for it - her facial expressions make the language irrelevant - was the same as your explanation as why it's unnecessary.Kionon wrote:Japanese language use. I didn't understand your use of the beginning scene at all. Your audience will, as a majority, not understand it. And the significance is limited at best, because the information is available nonverbally through Utena's facial expressions. If you understand Japanese, and you believed your audience understood Japanese, perhaps I would better understand it, but this isn't the case for your audience as a whole. At least not on the org.
That is fantastic feedback, and it's stuff that I've thought more and more about each time I've watched it. I'm still trying to feel the balance between presenting too much and not enough, cutting too fast and staying too long. There are things that look and feel right during editing that drag while watching - I'm hoping that's a sense of scale that'll improve with experience.Kionon wrote:Editing flow. This is where you show that you have a better grasp of sync than the majority of first-time editors. Your cuts indicate that you are trying to follow the rather disjointed nature of both the lyrics and the aural qualities of the music. This is very impressive. Let me say that again, before I go off into more negatives, so you have it in your mind. This is very impressive. Most first videos focus on either action synced solely to the lyrics or solely to the aural qualities of the music. Rare is the first video that can do both, especially given the rather schizophrenic nature of the song in question.
However, I say this with the caveat that this is indeed a first video, and you could have done it better. You stayed on many scenes far too long, and many of your scene choices were far too chronological even when your cuts mirrored the frenzy of the music. Knowing what I know about the series, I felt there were some much better scene choices that could have been utilised for certain lyrical passages. Intentionally presenting those scenes, across the entire series, in a way that was intentionally non-chronological would have presented a far better representation of both the expressed disjointedness of the music while hammering home that the same sort of mental disjointedness exists in the characters of the series, and indeed, cause and effect are intentionally blurred in the series for dramatic effect. That you were able to tap into this, and demonstrate to me that you were aware of it, and aware of some of the ways in which you could present it shows a very well developed sense of artistic deconstruction. We simply need to work on your scene identification and editing skills so that you transcend a work that shows you understand where you were trying to go and a work that actually gets you there.
That was great criticism and I appreciate it. Thanks so much for watching it!Kionon wrote:That really was positive, I swear. Good job.
Ha! I think that'll go in my sig.Code wrote:ginshirou, when Kionon writes a book about your video, that is something to be VERY proud of.