Rape nudity vs. sexual nudity
- staces
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 12:53 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Rape nudity vs. sexual nudity
Hello, I was just curious about something. I know that the site says that you can't locally host any vids with sexual nudity, and I respect that any everything. But it seems that the admins. are either turning a blind eye to rape nudity or under the rules does rape nudity not count? Because I have seen a good plenty of vids around that do show nudity and the act of rape (penetration) hosted locally. . .
And even though we all know rape is an aggressive act, not a sexual act, what is the difference when it comes to the simple visual of it? It's the same action and visual regardless of the motivation. =/ So I was just wondering why one was allowed rather than neither or both?
Also, how will people even know if it's a rape scene or a sexual one sometimes? In Ai no Kusabi and probably some other hentais out there, whether the act is rape or not is subjective. In anime/hentai it's not always clear whether it's rape or not. =(
OR have all the rape vids just been slipping though the cracks? Because if they're genuinely allowed I have vids of mine that I'd like to host locally.
And even though we all know rape is an aggressive act, not a sexual act, what is the difference when it comes to the simple visual of it? It's the same action and visual regardless of the motivation. =/ So I was just wondering why one was allowed rather than neither or both?
Also, how will people even know if it's a rape scene or a sexual one sometimes? In Ai no Kusabi and probably some other hentais out there, whether the act is rape or not is subjective. In anime/hentai it's not always clear whether it's rape or not. =(
OR have all the rape vids just been slipping though the cracks? Because if they're genuinely allowed I have vids of mine that I'd like to host locally.
- Castor Troy
- Ryan Molina, A.C.E
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2001 8:45 pm
- Status: Retired from AMVs
- Location: California
- Contact:
- godix
- a disturbed member
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 12:13 am
It's a gray area. As far as I can tell the general rule is 'if it's designed to give you a woody it ain't allowed. If it's artistic nudity then it's ok' but keep in mind that I'm not and admin and that's still a rather vauge definition. If you want to know if your vids would be allowed then put it on a yousendit link and ask the admins to watch it and judge.
- staces
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 12:53 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
I'll keep that in mind and try it. . . I just wish the sites "no excessive violence" and "no sexual nudity" were a little less vague. =/godix wrote:It's a gray area. As far as I can tell the general rule is 'if it's designed to give you a woody it ain't allowed. If it's artistic nudity then it's ok' but keep in mind that I'm not and admin and that's still a rather vauge definition. If you want to know if your vids would be allowed then put it on a yousendit link and ask the admins to watch it and judge.
- staces
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 12:53 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rape nudity vs. sexual nudity
Thats a definate possibility.staces wrote:OR have all the rape vids just been slipping though the cracks? Because if they're genuinely allowed I have vids of mine that I'd like to host locally.
- Arigatomina
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:04 am
- Contact:
Things like this are all judged on a case-by-case basis. If you have a scene you think may be too explicit, drop it in the mods' box so it can be looked at and checked.
One sexual nudity scene I know of that is used repeatedly to the point of being up there with vegeta-goku fights actually shows forced intercourse between two nude people, one of whom is underage. Why is this allowed? Probably because the characters are distant, blurred and colored into vague shapes, and there's a slight possibility that the person on top is torturing the one on bottom rather than raping (and torturing is allowed so long as it isn't explicit with body parts falling off and bloody bits lying around).
To me, the rape scene in Yami no Matsuei is too explicit for me to use in a local video. But that's only because Hisoka if 14. As a 'rape scene' it's not nearly as explicit as Perfect Blue, and as a 'violence scene' it's no where near some of the scenes in the Kenshin ovas. So I personally wouldn't use that scene, but I can see why it isn't up there with the boycotted material (violent or sexual).
Ai no Kusabi, though, that has scenes that definitely should *not* be on the local server. Unfortunately, I'm too loyal to report those videos. ^^;
One sexual nudity scene I know of that is used repeatedly to the point of being up there with vegeta-goku fights actually shows forced intercourse between two nude people, one of whom is underage. Why is this allowed? Probably because the characters are distant, blurred and colored into vague shapes, and there's a slight possibility that the person on top is torturing the one on bottom rather than raping (and torturing is allowed so long as it isn't explicit with body parts falling off and bloody bits lying around).
To me, the rape scene in Yami no Matsuei is too explicit for me to use in a local video. But that's only because Hisoka if 14. As a 'rape scene' it's not nearly as explicit as Perfect Blue, and as a 'violence scene' it's no where near some of the scenes in the Kenshin ovas. So I personally wouldn't use that scene, but I can see why it isn't up there with the boycotted material (violent or sexual).
Ai no Kusabi, though, that has scenes that definitely should *not* be on the local server. Unfortunately, I'm too loyal to report those videos. ^^;
- bum
- 17747114553
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 9:56 pm
How about we (or, the mods) just go around deleting every vid with sexual/rape/whatever nudity. Whatever their is of it, I'm sure that phade would never want any of it on his server. About violence, most of the Kenshin/samurai X LOCAL vids could probably earn a deletion. I thing the no violence/sex rule is something which hasnt bein enforced enough as it should. All it would take is a single perant who sees a perfect blue vid their 12 year old kid dl'd to bring down this site. I know the restrictions may restrict good editors trying to pull a specific something off. But anyone serios enough could get their own hosting easily enough. Also, I think that vids which break the violence/sex rule should only be allowed indirect linking, as a certian perant woent see the difference between a local and direct link.
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
- Knowname
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2002 5:49 pm
- Status: Indubitably
- Location: Sanity, USA (on the edge... very edge)
the violence in Elfen Leid is pureley artistic. Exploding heads! That's comedy not violence.godix wrote:It's a gray area. As far as I can tell the general rule is 'if it's designed to give you a woody it ain't allowed. If it's artistic nudity then it's ok' but keep in mind that I'm not and admin and that's still a rather vauge definition. If you want to know if your vids would be allowed then put it on a yousendit link and ask the admins to watch it and judge.