There aren't enough 80s songs

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jan 27, 2007 1:27 pm

Streicher wrote:It looked really terrible. Didn't finish watching because of that.
I don't know why you kept editing in this quality.

Sorry about that. That sucks that quality is that important to you. Honestly there are WAY worse quality vids. It's a long story as to why the quality suffered, to put it short:

It was either synch or quality. I picked synch.

Admittedly, the video quality does need some improvement. However, the overall video itself was pretty good.

Also, although I was too young to remember most of the 80's, it would be interesting to see more videos that use songs from that era. Smile

Thanks for commenting.

niko1986 · Post by **niko1986** » Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:11 pm

Quality issues!?! I couldn't see anything wrong with it

Really good video, never seen scryed might try and watch it now.

I got an urge to watch Transformers again now

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:16 pm

niko1986 wrote:Quality issues!?! I couldn't see anything wrong with it Really good video, never seen scryed might try and watch it now.

I got an urge to watch Transformers again now

The quality did take a hit with saving as a WMV before, a little rough around some edges and at its worse when the Alter lights are on screen you could see pixelation, but I also don't think it was that bad.

Thanks for the comments.

Autraya · Post by **Autraya** » Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:12 pm

much splotchyness wiggledude

but that's already been mentioned, did you use msmooth or something? it has done that to me before.
I liked the sync/scene selection in this bit 1:34 - 1:50, but I was dissapointed with the rest, you have a good idea/concept it just needs a lot of re-work this looks like a beta not a final because of that.

I'm not trying to be nasty at all, just honnest so please don't take offence
If you'd like I'll beta your next vid?

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:15 pm

I don't do Betas since I just use WMM, but I don't mind the honest feedback. Funny that part is your favorite part...that's probably like my least. Ha, oh well.

Fuze · Post by **Fuze** » Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:35 pm

Good, smooth video. As everyone mentioned, there were quality issues. I've seen worse though.

Sync > Video Quality.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:45 pm

Fuze wrote:Good, smooth video. As everyone mentioned, there were quality issues. I've seen worse though.

Sync > Video Quality.

Thanks for the comments, dude.

Autraya · Post by **Autraya** » Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:57 pm

WMM, I've seen some good stuff (and a lot of crap) come from people using that program.
a while ago sweetdeily did a wmm s-cry-ed vid and her vis quality went a little bit worse than yours 'cause she compressed lossy before editing. but it looks like you went the the trouble to encode avi afterwards. is this what happened to yours?
I think I shold go back to wmm and make a super clean vis qual vid just to

at the poo pooers out there. Some people will laugh, but the last vid I made using wmm i was exipirimenting on, encoded to xvid(lossy) re-imported half of the project when wmm crapped itself and I only then started using avi-synth to clean stuff. I gotta say the visual quality pretty fooking good, better than anything I had done before, esp considering how much I mangled the sources and how many editing "rules" I broke. So I know it can be done, if one puts thier mind to it.

Bebop0083 · Post by **Bebop0083** » Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:26 pm

after hearing a few people bitch about the pixelation it really wasnt that bad at all. i thought the quality was pretty good. keep up the good work.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:02 pm

Bebop0083 wrote:after hearing a few people bitch about the pixelation it really wasnt that bad at all. i thought the quality was pretty good. keep up the good work.

Thanks for commenting and the opinion.