only if you dont leave them feedback as to why their video is hated so much so that they can improvex_rex30 wrote:I have rated a lot of videos a 1. Does that make me an ass
How bad does an AMV have to be?
- JaddziaDax
- Crazy Cat Lady!
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:25 am
- Status: I live?
- Location: Somewhere I think O.o
- Contact:
Stalk me?
https://linktr.ee/jaddziadax
https://linktr.ee/jaddziadax
- Willen
- Now in Hi-Def!
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:50 am
- Status: Melancholy
- Location: SOS-Dan HQ
Crying while wanking = emo!JaddziaDax wrote:only if you dont leave them feedback as to why their video is hated so much so that they can improvex_rex30 wrote:I have rated a lot of videos a 1. Does that make me an assso they can cry and wank about it in the forums
And some of these videos are so old, that I hope the editors don't need my feedback...
- JaddziaDax
- Crazy Cat Lady!
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:25 am
- Status: I live?
- Location: Somewhere I think O.o
- Contact:
lmao come on thats like the second worst amv i ever made!!!Willen wrote:And some of these videos are so old, that I hope the editors don't need my feedback...
gives me da feed backs or i will die (just kidding)
the worst amv i ever made isnt even on the org... nor will it ever be there O.O
Stalk me?
https://linktr.ee/jaddziadax
https://linktr.ee/jaddziadax
- Denkyufan
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:49 am
Out of the thousands of videos submitted on this site I have only found one video that has recieved less than 2 stars.
The video to recieve less stars is:
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/lists/s ... o=bayscore
The video is:
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... d_id=22733
There's only 43 videos under 2.5 stars out of the 60,758 that have been submitted.
The video to recieve less stars is:
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/lists/s ... o=bayscore
The video is:
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... d_id=22733
There's only 43 videos under 2.5 stars out of the 60,758 that have been submitted.
- devilmaykickass
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 8:47 pm
- bum
- 17747114553
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 9:56 pm
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
Hmm... it seems that even the very lowest rated vids on the entire site just barely dip below 2 stars. It might be interesting to see a sort of "scaled rating" where the lowest scored video on the site has a score of 0 and the highest rated has a score of 5. That would help to spread the scores out a bit and make them more meaningful maybe?
- requiett
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 6:49 pm
- Location: Alaska
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grading_curveZarxrax wrote:Hmm... it seems that even the very lowest rated vids on the entire site just barely dip below 2 stars. It might be interesting to see a sort of "scaled rating" where the lowest scored video on the site has a score of 0 and the highest rated has a score of 5. That would help to spread the scores out a bit and make them more meaningful maybe?
- Denkyufan
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:49 am
Maybe the star ratings should be considered the the video is what ever is stated minus 1 star. That would create more of a spread as 99.99% of the videos on this site are 2.10 stars are above.Zarxrax wrote:Hmm... it seems that even the very lowest rated vids on the entire site just barely dip below 2 stars. It might be interesting to see a sort of "scaled rating" where the lowest scored video on the site has a score of 0 and the highest rated has a score of 5. That would help to spread the scores out a bit and make them more meaningful maybe?
- Keeper of Hellfire
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 am
- Location: Germany
To deserve a 1 a vid must be really crappy. Bad footage, bad (qualitywise) music, no concept, really bad synching. Amongst the AMV's that I donwloaded was none that bad.
Enhancing the star scale to zero would possibly spread the range a bit and lower the medium score. But it would be unfair for new AMV's compared with already rated ones. That way the old stars had to be adjusted, what would be unfair either, or there had to be made a break old/new stars.
I'm fine with the distribution of the stars as it is. You must be aware that not 3.0 stars marks the middle like you might expect from a 1...5 rating, it's 3.5. If you look at the distribution of the stars, it drops very fast below 4.0, and a really wide range is 3.5 +/- 0.3 marking the average ones, and the drop below 3.0 happens close to the end. So the distribution curve is a bit squished, but in order.
Enhancing the star scale to zero would possibly spread the range a bit and lower the medium score. But it would be unfair for new AMV's compared with already rated ones. That way the old stars had to be adjusted, what would be unfair either, or there had to be made a break old/new stars.
I'm fine with the distribution of the stars as it is. You must be aware that not 3.0 stars marks the middle like you might expect from a 1...5 rating, it's 3.5. If you look at the distribution of the stars, it drops very fast below 4.0, and a really wide range is 3.5 +/- 0.3 marking the average ones, and the drop below 3.0 happens close to the end. So the distribution curve is a bit squished, but in order.
