OMG!! A G GUNDAM VID THAT ISN'T ABOUT DOMON X RAIN?!!

aesling · Post by **aesling** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:00 pm

I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with Warheart on this one.

Also, the internal synch could have used some work, since it seems to me that's pretty much what instrumental videos rely on. There was some internal synch, but not nearly enough. And between about 3:24 or so and 3:26, there were a buch of clips that didn't seem to sych to anything.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:09 pm

No pleasing the perfectionists.

Think whatever you want. I spent a good long time on this trying to synch it, but I guess if some can't even SEE it, oh well.

Any others who want to jump on the "Flame my video" bandwagon?

SuperFusion · Post by **SuperFusion** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:24 pm

Shit, that video sucked.

I agree with Warheart AND aesling.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:26 pm

SuperFusion wrote:Shit, that video sucked.

I agree with Warheart AND aesling.

Yeah, yeah.

Bandwagon whore alert.

SuperFusion · Post by **SuperFusion** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:28 pm

Well, maybe if you weren't being a dick towards actual good criticism (not mine, Warheart's and aesling's), you wouldn't be getting this.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:29 pm

SuperFusion wrote:Well, maybe if you weren't being a dick towards actual good criticism (not mine, Warheart's and aesling's), you wouldn't be getting this.

What dick? "Work on your editing"?

Ok...I thought I did a good job on it, that's SOO constructive. How about telling me what was so wrong with it, or what they hated so much.

Gee, no new quick comments OR opinions. Yeah, LOTS of good THAT did.

Bebop0083 · Post by **Bebop0083** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:31 pm

What constructive critisism? They didn't say anything other than "no synch".

Guess, being specific isn't in a perfectionist's dictionary

SuperFusion · Post by **SuperFusion** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:32 pm

What do you need an opinion for if they're replying to your thread? I can see your reply to a negative opinion now. And besides, they did tell you what they didn't like about your video.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:34 pm

SuperFusion wrote:What do you need an opinion for if they're replying to your thread? I can see your reply to a negative opinion now. And besides, they did tell you what they didn't like about your video.

I've gotten negative opinions before. Since I *USUALLY* like my stuff, when I get a negative comment that has no reason, I want to know. What the hell was wrong with it? What was wrong with my editing? If you think it has no synch at all, when I tried for hours and hours TO synch it, they maybe I should just edit blind in 4 minutes with my eyes closed?

"Constructive critisism" Where? Point to it in this topic.

SuperFusion · Post by **SuperFusion** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:42 pm

Warheart wrote:No actual sync, moving mouths and wmv with the usual shitty quality. I'm sorry but that wasn't good at all. You should read the guides and change your editing a bit.

Pointing out your synch for 1 (what else more do you want him to do? do one of those "00:00 - 00:20 - yeah this part failed badder than the rests" opinions.

He also pointed out mouth movement. He pointed out your bad quality. And referred you to the guides. Get to it, huh?

aesling wrote:Also, the internal synch could have used some work, since it seems to me that's pretty much what instrumental videos rely on. There was some internal synch, but not nearly enough. And between about 3:24 or so and 3:26, there were a buch of clips that didn't seem to sych to anything.

She's pointing out that she doesn't think you synched ENOUGH.

What else can these people tell you except try harder?