Damn Bigotted Liberals

BishounenStalker · Post by **BishounenStalker** » Thu Jun 12, 2003 5:41 pm

kthulhu wrote:
the Black Monarch wrote:If they want to bitch at us for enforcing their decisions... well, let them try to stop us
Kofi Annon: "We have a billion reams of declarations! Drop them from the black helicopters and papercut the Americans to hell!"

US Soldiers: "The missiles and bullets, they do nothing!"

The President: "I'll be in my secret Area 51 security bunker during this crisis. I have also pre-bandaged my hands against this paper UN menace. Oh yeah, the shadow government's in charge now!"

John Ashcroft: "Sweet Jesus God, there is pornography among these declarations! I mean, look at these b's and c's! They sure do look obscene!"

Vice Prez Dick Cheney: "I wipe my ass with you, global disarmament and oppression conspiracy ! I wipe my ass with you, human rights declaration! I wipe my ass with you, `Goodwill declaration to not remotely deactivate Vice Prez Cheney's pacemaker'! Strange, the old girl's stop bea-"

I fear the UN .

LMAO!!!!!!!!!

Funniest thing I've heard all week

the Black Monarch · Post by **the Black Monarch** » Thu Jun 12, 2003 11:43 pm

BishounenStalker wrote:Iraq had been successfully contained for 13 years. If a few whispered rumors were enough to send him trotting off to battle, then I think he's a little too trigger-happy of a President for my taste (either that or our intelligence officers were stretching the truth, in which case the problem is beyond the scope of the Oval Office). Until we can find some substantial evidence to support the main reason we believe we were going into Iraq (WMDs).

The head honcho of Iraq's nuklear weapons project defected and said that Iraq was months or at most a few years away from having working nuclear weapons. I consider him a higher authority on the subject than you.

But you're partially right; the CIA is not the most honest of organizations...

inanna · Post by **inanna** » Fri Jun 13, 2003 1:38 am

But you're partially right; the CIA is not the most honest of organizations...

I don't why that statement erks me soo badly....

Maybe because it seems (at least from your posts) that you one of those "The US! Right or Wrong!" Kinda guys that just don't question what your handed. Of course I could be wrong. Still why would you say that? Because of Nigeria or Angola, or just because the cia has a reputation of being the bad guy in movies.

* Sighs *

EarthCurrent · Post by **EarthCurrent** » Fri Jun 13, 2003 2:36 am

inanna wrote:
But you're partially right; the CIA is not the most honest of organizations...
I don't why that statement erks me soo badly....

Maybe because it seems (at least from your posts) that you one of those "The US! Right or Wrong!" Kinda guys that just don't question what your handed. Of course I could be wrong. Still why would you say that? Because of Nigeria or Angola, or just because the cia has a reputation of being the bad guy in movies.

* Sighs *

The CIA and any other intellegence gathering organization would not function if they were "honest."

Mroni · Post by **Mroni** » Fri Jun 13, 2003 4:30 am

Damn this the thread that won't die! Ok ex Md Govenor Glendenning was a democratic smuck. Any arguments?

Mr Oni