[AKROSS Con 2011] Diva

[MimS]

Honestly, I don't get why this vid receives so many good ops :s
I'm amazed by your transitions, I admit it but... I feel like I've seen many other interesting things in M@Ds, also, it was so boring to me, there was no research for the fonts... Imho, it lacks something to make it good for real.

It's always interesting how people define mads, everyone seem to have different ideas...usually the wrong ideas at that -_-. This isn't a mad anyway, its motion graphics/design...which i personally enjoy

Well, since you quote me :

Even if it's seen as motion graphic, I can give the same op. I mean, seriously...
Just watch and see the difference : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywxL7HHCiyg or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2kvtRprvkk&ob=av2e
Just examples...

@S.A.Robert : Really I don't have anything against you, this is just my op, it's personal, I don't want to seem rude, just try to explain why I think what I think :s

[Chained(E)Studio]

I liked it overall, it was really nice to see something different for AKROSS in general. But its lacking.. I had to force myself to keep watching because it just lacked in a lot of eye detail, and just design to draw the viewer in. It felt really long, and boring... and as it kept going you could tell where you would start to transition or where some little graphics would come into play. It just didn't leave me guessing, and I felt I could tell your steps without watching it.

I personally think its a M@D, my range of M@D types is widely open ='3. It may not have a lot "detail" that most M@Ds have, its still a M@D type of sorts. And even if its a "motion graphics/design." It still lacked...

It was a great first M@D type/motion design. I really hope to see you make something more, your work keeps changing and is becoming a little more widely open to the variety of editing.

[S.A. Robert]

Thanks all comments, I'm glad

its motion graphics/design

M@D type/motion design

That's right, I did not want to do ordinary M@D =)