feels like most of this amv is just a black screen, also buu @ sudden random flashes that spoils the somewhat existing flow.
This feels a bit lazy compared to seph's

I noticed u copied/pasted this in you're opCode wrote:Artistically and conceptually, I really enjoyed it.It was pretty to watch, and the execution of the theme was pretty good.
The text was not very good looking. Both font wise and in where it was positions. Plus, let's not have capital letters for every word. It's the journalist in me cringing there. I also cringed at the mispelling of they're.
It also doesn't have much of a hook to make me want to watch it again. I think because it lacked a climax or any sort of development. As somebody already said, it's pretty much the same video in terms of everything from beginning to end. Some variation in sync or editing probably would have done it good justice.
ACTUALLY, I was thinking halfway through the video that this song is a perfect video to mash up with another high-paced song at about the middle of the original song to create a video of awesomeness.
[Is it also safe to say this is the LAST thing I was expecting from you, but in a good way?]
[also, it glitches in Media Player Classic, had to play it in VLC]
Thanks for the feedback,I,ll try to make the next video betterArashinome wrote:Pete's was a lot better and felt way more engaging.
This was snoorzeville.
Ishbalan wrote:They're
x2LittleAtari wrote:bleh, everyone in this thread is pretty supportive /sarcasm
Honestly, the video was done alright. I really think the big issue was that you released a video to a song that was just used in a well received video. I mean how long has it been since peter's video was released? It's still too fresh in people's minds to give this video a chance. Sorry bro, better luck next time.
2xCode wrote:Artistically and conceptually, I really enjoyed it.It was pretty to watch, and the execution of the theme was pretty good.
The text was not very good looking. Both font wise and in where it was positions. Plus, let's not have capital letters for every word. It's the journalist in me cringing there. I also cringed at the mispelling of they're.
It also doesn't have much of a hook to make me want to watch it again. I think because it lacked a climax or any sort of development. As somebody already said, it's pretty much the same video in terms of everything from beginning to end.