so dl it or not

http://tinyurl.com/5zrydd

Edit
mhm idgad wasn't so bad it could have some more sync but was somewhat enjoyable

More people? It's my seventh time on that queue and it just takes longer and longer every time.blabbler wrote:queue starts over thereScott Green wrote:fuck your skittles
Skittles was already 720p.Flusel wrote:very interesting technical experiment. I think the 60 fps "upscale" looks surprising good on certain scenes, and expactable bad on others. In general I would not keep this one because the upscale was not used wisely, so to speak. However, a good size upscale algorythm for 720p or 1080p can really make a vid look much better on high resolution screens, since your decoder won't be able to do a similar upscale on the fly. So I always keep 720p upscale versions, but 60fps are overkill in this case.
you know it, though ^^ I am sure ^^
The loose "sync" was something we were asked to do. The orchestra was playing the music live and they said it may be up to 5 seconds off sync anyway during the concert, so they didn't want us to sync perfectly on beat. It was more of a "rolling" sync kinda thing.Michael188PL wrote: mhm idgad wasn't so bad it could have some more sync but was somewhat enjoyable
It looks pretty good to me actually.. played it over and over last night full screen on a 37"mirkosp wrote:Skittles was already 720p.Flusel wrote:very interesting technical experiment. I think the 60 fps "upscale" looks surprising good on certain scenes, and expactable bad on others. In general I would not keep this one because the upscale was not used wisely, so to speak. However, a good size upscale algorythm for 720p or 1080p can really make a vid look much better on high resolution screens, since your decoder won't be able to do a similar upscale on the fly. So I always keep 720p upscale versions, but 60fps are overkill in this case.
you know it, though ^^ I am sure ^^![]()
It's just the 60fps that didn't come out well cause he did 24 -> 99 -> 60 instead of 24 -> 60.