
Well done

Hrm. That's an interesting viewpoint, never thought about it that way. You could be right...DriftRoot wrote:This was a nice idea, although in retrospect it seems a little too obvious in its faux originality. What do I mean? This is what I would expect from an AMV using this "music" and while that's not necessarily a bad thing, it's just that the entire premise of the audio is clearly to BE unexpected...and yet to me nothing in this AMV was, which is to say it was almost too comfortable a fit.
It's your call, really. I don't know what you were trying to do and I've learned the hard way to avoid speculating on that sort of thing. I did think this AMV was quite unique and fresh, just not in terms of "song" interpretation, which isn't a bad thing if you weren't focused on that as a goal.Janzki wrote:Hrm. That's an interesting viewpoint, never thought about it that way. You could be right...DriftRoot wrote:This was a nice idea, although in retrospect it seems a little too obvious in its faux originality. What do I mean? This is what I would expect from an AMV using this "music" and while that's not necessarily a bad thing, it's just that the entire premise of the audio is clearly to BE unexpected...and yet to me nothing in this AMV was, which is to say it was almost too comfortable a fit.
You're not mistaken, but I didn't really try to make the video follow the plot of the book or anything. It's just random weirdness made for s & g's.ShatteredFlame wrote:If I'm not mistaken the song was inspired by the book House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski, right?
I just found this weird. I was expecting it to be somewhat like the book, but no. You did get 'some' of the aspects, the house & the stairways, everything else was just random 'dark' scenes =l
Awesome book and song, ok amv.
I still regret not participating in Conet.OtohikOWNED wrote:This video in three words:
Conet with lipsync?
But then there was lipsync in Conet too