Lucky Star without dancing? Are you feeling okay?

[Unlimited Rice]

EDIT:
also ...1908 ...is that some sort of joke i didn't get ....? >.>;

Note the "100" behind it. 1908 + 100 = 2008

That's not "100" behind it. That's part of the "1908" that's enlarged, the 8 just got cut off on the side.
January 1908 is probably January 19, 2008 even though he released it on the 20th

[meleechampion]

EDIT:
also ...1908 ...is that some sort of joke i didn't get ....? >.>;

Note the "100" behind it. 1908 + 100 = 2008

That's not "100" behind it. That's part of the "1908" that's enlarged, the 8 just got cut off on the side.
January 1908 is probably January 19, 2008 even though he released it on the 20th

OR his editing rig isn't ready for Y2K so it still puts the 19- prefix on the double digit year dates used for auto-credits

[surfsama]

EDIT:
also ...1908 ...is that some sort of joke i didn't get ....? >.>;

Note the "100" behind it. 1908 + 100 = 2008

That's not "100" behind it. That's part of the "1908" that's enlarged, the 8 just got cut off on the side.
January 1908 is probably January 19, 2008 even though he released it on the 20th

When PAS decoded it I thought, Damn! this guy is slick but ya, Unlimited is right...

[MiyaDV]

EDIT:
also ...1908 ...is that some sort of joke i didn't get ....? >.>;

Note the "100" behind it. 1908 + 100 = 2008

That's not "100" behind it. That's part of the "1908" that's enlarged, the 8 just got cut off on the side.
January 1908 is probably January 19, 2008 even though he released it on the 20th

When PAS decoded it I thought, Damn! this guy is slick but ya, Unlimited is right...

no, I think meleechampion is right.

[Pas]

EDIT:
also ...1908 ...is that some sort of joke i didn't get ....? >.>;

Note the "100" behind it. 1908 + 100 = 2008

That's not "100" behind it. That's part of the "1908" that's enlarged, the 8 just got cut off on the side.
January 1908 is probably January 19, 2008 even though he released it on the 20th

When PAS decoded it I thought, Damn! this guy is slick but ya, Unlimited is right...

Yeah I checked just now to confirm it, damn I missed the mark >3>

[Emotive]

Well this was pretty mediocre... I got it for the portishead but I was expecting better. Where's the AE in that though?

[CodeZTM]

... Okay, okay. I'm sorry I called you a child molesting, paedophilia endorsing tool of the evil japanese empire. Since I now know you like my lame video, and that (in other respects) your depravity is equalled by many others here, it is now clear to me that I was leaping to conclusions .

Yes. Quite clear.

[TriGGiT]

video is like (o_O)
liked what was done with the credits

[Kevmaster]

Good stuff.

[blabbler]

Well, at least I know how to get up to three pages of comments now - you just end on a lame and moderately obscure joke.
Right, it was started on 19/08, but that's not it. It does look like a '100' behind it, but that's not it either...
Yes, it's a limp y2k reference, apologies to all you young scamps that don't remember the pre-millenial terror of living on the razor's edge between civilization and anarchy. Our toasters were going to revolt, I tells ya.
Anyway, that was what the interference and computer error mistakes were about.
Yes, that was completely undeveloped as a theme.

It seemed too ....abstract.

It is too abstract.

It might be 60fps, which could be fudging with your playback, dunno, sorry.

(imagine caps)

yeah

this video was awesome

whooo

(imagine sincerity)

Thanks awfully, old bean.

...is not bad, it is good in way...

Glad you liked it. See? I took your comments on the last one into account and made it less random and weird.

Oh...

I liked it

Then you are a principled and dignified person, thanks.

...video. Fuckin...

Sir, you are clearly a man of taste, class and refinement. I doff my hat to your good self.

freaking... stuff sir... stuff!

Another noble and gentlemanly individual, clearly. Thanks, matey.

Really interesting video.

Thanks. You may want to check your thesaurus, as 'interesting' isn't actually synonymous with 'teh gheyness' unless you italicise it.

lol

Thank you. Oh man, I wish I hadn't thrown away that draft of my oscar acceptance speech, it would really go nicely here.

Damn! this guy is slick... (qualifying statement goes here)

Sorry, if I can work out how to make a signature, that might just have to go in it.

pretty mediocre...

Where's the AE in that though?

Shame you didn't like it, but to be honest I'm surprised anyone does so...
Anyway, if you mean AE as in 'the 3d shapes that spin around', I must've left them under another layer or something. I used a fair old bit of masked colour correction layers, and time-remapped most everything.
So... you use what you like, and can get your hands on, right?

I was expecting better.

Lol. Obviously not basing that expectation on my previous efforts then.

Thanks for watching/commenting though.

liked what was done with the credits

Since the entire thing was a protracted credit sequence, I'll grant you that. Thanks very much.

Good stuff.

Thank you kindly.



Cheers everyone.