Well, at least I know how to get up to three pages of comments now - you just end on a lame and moderately obscure joke.
Right, it was started on 19/08, but that's not it. It does
look like a '100' behind it, but that's not it either...
Yes, it's a limp y2k reference, apologies to all you young scamps that don't remember the pre-millenial terror of living on the razor's edge between civilization and anarchy. Our toasters were going to revolt, I tells ya.
Anyway, that was what the interference and computer error mistakes were about.
Yes, that was completely undeveloped as a theme.
guy07 wrote:
It seemed too ....abstract.
It
is too abstract.
It might be 60fps, which could be fudging with your playback, dunno, sorry.
meleechampion wrote:
(imagine caps)
yeah
this video was awesome
whooo
(imagine sincerity)
Thanks awfully, old bean.
Falconone wrote:
...is not bad, it is good in way...
Glad you liked it. See? I took your comments on the last one into account and made it less random and weird.
Oh...
Nunchuck wrote:
I liked it
Then you are a principled and dignified person, thanks.
AtomX wrote:
...video. Fuckin...
Sir, you are clearly a man of taste, class and refinement. I doff my hat to your good self.
Neverend wrote:
freaking... stuff sir... stuff!
Another noble and gentlemanly individual, clearly. Thanks, matey.
Unlimited Rice wrote:
Really interesting video.
Thanks. You may want to check your thesaurus, as 'interesting' isn't actually synonymous with 'teh gheyness' unless you italicise it.
MiyaDV wrote:
lol
Thank you. Oh man, I wish I hadn't thrown away that draft of my oscar acceptance speech, it would really go nicely here.
surfsama wrote:
Damn! this guy is slick... (qualifying statement goes here)
Sorry, if I can work out how to make a signature, that might just have to go in it.
Cast to Stone wrote:
pretty mediocre...
Where's the AE in that though?
Shame you didn't like it, but to be honest I'm surprised anyone does so...
Anyway, if you mean AE as in 'the 3d shapes that spin around', I must've left them under another layer or something. I used a fair old bit of masked colour correction layers, and time-remapped most everything.
So... you use what you like, and can get your hands on, right?
Cast to Stone wrote:
I was expecting better.
Lol. Obviously not basing that expectation on my previous efforts then.
Thanks for watching/commenting though.
TriGGiT wrote:
liked what was done with the credits
Since the entire thing was a protracted credit sequence, I'll grant you that. Thanks very much.
Kevmaster wrote:
Good stuff.
Thank you kindly.
Cheers everyone.