JCA
Forum rules
Coordinators who fail to maintain necessary communication with entrants, or provide timely updates on results may be barred from announcing future events.
Coordinators who fail to maintain necessary communication with entrants, or provide timely updates on results may be barred from announcing future events.
- Castor Troy
- Ryan Molina, A.C.E
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2001 8:45 pm
- Status: Retired from AMVs
- Location: California
- Contact:
- JudgeHolden
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:49 am
- Status: Looking at you through your window!
- Location: The great white north (Minneapolis)
- godix
- a disturbed member
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 12:13 am
The stars, ops, all time, and weekly lists aren't meant to be contests. The fact that some view them that way says a lot more about them than it does about the sites competitiveness.JudgeHolden wrote:Well, after all this ... I think adding yet another competitive aspect to this site is very bad idea. We already have Stars, OPS, VCAS, All-time and weekly lists of "Who's da best" .... do we really need to add to the drama? How about this .... do a RDS Picks and post them there? RDS's best of '07?
- dwchang
- Sad Boy on Site
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 12:22 am
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
SHADDUP! I AM TEH BEST AND YOU'RE JUST JEALOUS!godix wrote:The stars, ops, all time, and weekly lists aren't meant to be contests. The fact that some view them that way says a lot more about them than it does about the sites competitiveness.JudgeHolden wrote:Well, after all this ... I think adding yet another competitive aspect to this site is very bad idea. We already have Stars, OPS, VCAS, All-time and weekly lists of "Who's da best" .... do we really need to add to the drama? How about this .... do a RDS Picks and post them there? RDS's best of '07?

On a serious note, I do agree though. It's amazing what a few years and experience will do. I just don't seem to care as much about such things like I used to when I joined the site. Maturity FTW?
Sadly I believe I'm in the minority. Oh well, whatever floats your boat.
-Daniel
Newest Video: Through the Years and Far Away aka Sad Girl in Space
Newest Video: Through the Years and Far Away aka Sad Girl in Space
- Purge
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:18 am
- Location: Under Aus
- Beowulf
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
- Location: in the art house
- Contact:
- Kalium
- Sir Bugsalot
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:17 pm
- Location: Plymouth, Michigan
Let's try a different tack here:
Where's the need? Why is this necessary? What concrete problem does this address, what wrong does it right, what issue does this solve?
All I see is a vague mention of people complaining of popularity (as measured by the awards) versus 'deservingness' (conveniently undefined and unmeasured).
Plus, could someone please define the meaning of 'balance' in the context of an AMV contest? It's not like we have some objective standard for judging videos.
Where's the need? Why is this necessary? What concrete problem does this address, what wrong does it right, what issue does this solve?
All I see is a vague mention of people complaining of popularity (as measured by the awards) versus 'deservingness' (conveniently undefined and unmeasured).
Plus, could someone please define the meaning of 'balance' in the context of an AMV contest? It's not like we have some objective standard for judging videos.
- Pwolf
- Friendly Neighborhood Pwaffle
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 4:17 pm
- Location: Some where in California, I forgot :\
- Contact:
good pointsKalium wrote:Let's try a different tack here:
Where's the need? Why is this necessary? What concrete problem does this address, what wrong does it right, what issue does this solve?
All I see is a vague mention of people complaining of popularity (as measured by the awards) versus 'deservingness' (conveniently undefined and unmeasured).
Plus, could someone please define the meaning of 'balance' in the context of an AMV contest? It's not like we have some objective standard for judging videos.
Pwolf
- Beowulf
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
- Location: in the art house
- Contact:
I think it would be cool to have a panel of judges that most everyone here thinks are qualified. These people would either:
A: Won various awards
B: Been around long enough to have seen trends rise and fall
C: Be generally recognized on the forums as "knowing wtf you're talking about"
Preferably all 3. The problem this solves is that the VCAs are their own punchline nowadays, and people seem to want some more qualified judgment in their AMV lives. This will give it to them. A group of generally recognized OGz will watch your video and see if they can open up the books for you.
Thats all
A: Won various awards
B: Been around long enough to have seen trends rise and fall
C: Be generally recognized on the forums as "knowing wtf you're talking about"
Preferably all 3. The problem this solves is that the VCAs are their own punchline nowadays, and people seem to want some more qualified judgment in their AMV lives. This will give it to them. A group of generally recognized OGz will watch your video and see if they can open up the books for you.
Thats all

- godix
- a disturbed member
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 12:13 am
What is the need, necessity, or problem solved by the VCAs, AWA, Acen, or any other existing contest? You're acting like the only thing to stop pro-JCA people from taking VCA winners behind the barn and shooting them in the head is you. This is just a contest idea guys. Don't like it? Don't participate it in, same as any other contest. Jesus, do you guys go to a first year con and bitch that they have a masquerade and amv contest despite the fact other cons had those long before? Take that stick out of your ass, it's been up there so long it's starting to decompose inside you. Sometimes 'because it'd be amusing for awhile' is a good enough reason to do something.Kalium wrote:Let's try a different tack here:
Where's the need? Why is this necessary? What concrete problem does this address, what wrong does it right, what issue does this solve?
All I see is a vague mention of people complaining of popularity (as measured by the awards) versus 'deservingness' (conveniently undefined and unmeasured).
Plus, could someone please define the meaning of 'balance' in the context of an AMV contest? It's not like we have some objective standard for judging videos.