Opinion score relativity
- Hax
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:08 pm
Opinion score relativity
Should opinion scores be relative to other AMVs or to what is physically possible?
Since that's a bit cryptic, let me give my example. I recently reviewed an AMV, and the video quality was VHS. However, it didn't look that bad for VHS, and I'm 99% sure that this particular anime was never released on DVD.
Should I have given him a high score for doing what they could with it? Or are they doomed to a low video score even though there's nothing they could do about it
Since that's a bit cryptic, let me give my example. I recently reviewed an AMV, and the video quality was VHS. However, it didn't look that bad for VHS, and I'm 99% sure that this particular anime was never released on DVD.
Should I have given him a high score for doing what they could with it? Or are they doomed to a low video score even though there's nothing they could do about it
AMVs that I have made:
Berserk - The Fight Must Go On - Drama, Action, Violent, Story
Teenage Cowboy Bebop Turtles(TCBT) - Fun, Trailer, Parody
Berserk - The Fight Must Go On - Drama, Action, Violent, Story
Teenage Cowboy Bebop Turtles(TCBT) - Fun, Trailer, Parody
- Infinity Squared
- Mr. Poopy Pants
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:07 pm
- Status: Shutting Down
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Hmm... interesting dilema.
Well, for such a situation, I would probably have to have known that such extenuating circumstances exist. Otherwise, automatically I would have judged it based on what is already available and what I have seen.
But if you think about it, the video quality score is very much just dependant on what you see right there and then (objectively speaking anyway). Therefore, we are suppose to make up our minds based only on the evidence on hand, no matter the circumstances present.
In the end, I doubt I'll score it any extra higher based on knowing that fact, as oppose to what I think it deserves in terms of comparing it to other video qualities.
Well, for such a situation, I would probably have to have known that such extenuating circumstances exist. Otherwise, automatically I would have judged it based on what is already available and what I have seen.
But if you think about it, the video quality score is very much just dependant on what you see right there and then (objectively speaking anyway). Therefore, we are suppose to make up our minds based only on the evidence on hand, no matter the circumstances present.
In the end, I doubt I'll score it any extra higher based on knowing that fact, as oppose to what I think it deserves in terms of comparing it to other video qualities.
- Keeper of Hellfire
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 am
- Location: Germany
- ssj4lonewolf
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:24 am
- Location: Stuck in Hell, i mean Phoenix....
- [Mike of the Desert]
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 5:56 am
- Status: Lonely
- Location: Earth -> Europe -> Italy -> Rome -> Cerveteri -> Sasso -> Home -> Mike's Room
- Contact:
- lilgumba
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 7:30 pm
- Location: Milky Way...okay IL
Lately I haven't really ran into that problem but I know when I first came here there were videos that were done two vcr instead of on the computer. You go through different techniques so things can't always look the same. I try to take into consideration how the video was made if possible when giving an opinion. I guess you could semi compare this to a person who uses movie maker 1 vs premiere or something. I knew that movie maker 1 would not be as good as premiere (usually) so I try to take that into account especially with compression issues. I guess I'm saying I am treating them like apples, pineapples, and oranges. They all fall into the fruit category but they are technically different.
- FoxJones
- The foxiest!
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 9:22 am
- Location: Lieto, Finland
- Contact:
- madbunny
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 3:12 pm
Score the video based on what you see. It's up to the creator to put forth what they consider to be the cleanest version that they can. You can always give them points in effort or overall to offset it.
If you want to compare one video to another, then you're just making it more complicated than it has to be. For example; we don't have a separate score for fansubs -vs- DVD either.
If you want to compare one video to another, then you're just making it more complicated than it has to be. For example; we don't have a separate score for fansubs -vs- DVD either.
Build a man a fire, and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire, and he will be warm for the rest of his life.
- [Mike of the Desert]
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 5:56 am
- Status: Lonely
- Location: Earth -> Europe -> Italy -> Rome -> Cerveteri -> Sasso -> Home -> Mike's Room
- Contact:
x2madbunny wrote:Score the video based on what you see. It's up to the creator to put forth what they consider to be the cleanest version that they can. You can always give them points in effort or overall to offset it.
If you want to compare one video to another, then you're just making it more complicated than it has to be. For example; we don't have a separate score for fansubs -vs- DVD either.
Everyone has his way to judge this is clear, but mines as I said before coincide with madbunny's, the score quality will be low or high depending on what I see in the moment without think in the source, Then I'll see what the source and the work they done can give in others categories. =)