i ask because i am making a video of the chunnin exam in naruto its not finished yet but its looking to be 10-12 min long


Any editing style, no matter how good, gets tedious after a while - this is why cons have 6-minute limits. I think the longest solo vid I've ever managed to watch the whole way through is Wonka's Die For Me (I *think* that's the title), and I've never watched it the whole way through since. It's an amazing video... but it's also brutal to watch multiple times, and I think most people would agree with me.x_rex30 wrote:Is that just knowing it's done by one person? How close minded.dokool wrote:a 10-12 minute video is fine if it's a multi-editor project, but if it's a single editor I wouldn't watch over 6 minutes or so.
And that's good for you. jBone and Wonka are also on a very short list of editors who can singlehandedly edit 8+ minutes and not suck. If every 'Org member put their best effort into a 10-minute solo video, <1% would be good enough to watch repeatedly.x_rex30 wrote:Urban Ragnarok is over 8 minutes long, and that video never get's old to me.
Can be, but often isn't. Plus this is <b>cortinator's</b> first video, and if he's still reading this thread I'd suggest he not choose such an ambitious first project...x_rex30 wrote:I never said it was easy, but I did say it could be good.
Instant gratification makes for high replay value - shorter videos are simply easier to get right, and when a short vid gets everything right (for example a DDR Project segment) then it's very replayable. Also videos that are shorter tend to be more upbeat (examples that immediately come to mind are Rozard's Price To Fly, AtomX's Why...Can't...I..., Scintilla's Waka Lala w/ Osaka, etc) and are just plain fun to watch multiple times.x_rex30 wrote:What I cant understand is people watching a short video in loops, now that gets old. An 8 minute song or an 8 minute video is a lot less repetitive and boring to listen/watch in loops than something that's like a minute or so long..