xort, how about I post a nifty little table built from the data for august?
Code: Select all
+------+-------------+---------------+---------------+----------+
| dls | video_count | bandwidth | pct_bandwidth | pct_vids |
+------+-------------+---------------+---------------+----------+
| 0 | 28858 | 9514086774818 | 33.00 | 79.39 |
| 50 | 6232 | 8798511199207 | 30.52 | 17.15 |
| 100 | 779 | 2910870116770 | 10.10 | 2.14 |
| 150 | 244 | 1557879731843 | 5.40 | 0.67 |
| 200 | 78 | 752857051190 | 2.61 | 0.21 |
| 250 | 38 | 452363007786 | 1.57 | 0.10 |
| 300 | 25 | 343384593580 | 1.19 | 0.07 |
| 350 | 21 | 369657854308 | 1.28 | 0.06 |
| 400 | 16 | 446654281788 | 1.55 | 0.04 |
| 450 | 11 | 228720772244 | 0.79 | 0.03 |
| 500 | 4 | 117028038332 | 0.41 | 0.01 |
| 550 | 7 | 192141559032 | 0.67 | 0.02 |
| 600 | 5 | 163223949786 | 0.57 | 0.01 |
| 650 | 2 | 71273460700 | 0.25 | 0.01 |
| 700 | 5 | 256076784162 | 0.89 | 0.01 |
| 750 | 2 | 572297822208 | 1.99 | 0.01 |
| 800 | 1 | 59119312896 | 0.21 | 0.00 |
| 850 | 2 | 90148339320 | 0.31 | 0.01 |
| 950 | 3 | 127361215000 | 0.44 | 0.01 |
| 1000 | 1 | 65488539648 | 0.23 | 0.00 |
| 1050 | 3 | 225380063412 | 0.78 | 0.01 |
| 1250 | 1 | 104206521200 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
| 1300 | 1 | 88189874392 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
| 1350 | 1 | 83647723520 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
| 1400 | 1 | 126969472540 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
| 1500 | 1 | 81662140416 | 0.28 | 0.00 |
| 1550 | 1 | 55376169526 | 0.19 | 0.00 |
| 1750 | 2 | 307129124864 | 1.07 | 0.01 |
| 1900 | 1 | 168448131072 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
| 2800 | 1 | 250930956288 | 0.87 | 0.00 |
| 3100 | 1 | 245862830080 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
+------+-------------+---------------+---------------+----------+
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
bandwidth - amount of bandwidth consumed by this group.
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
if you look at this data, you can see:
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
![Arrow :arrow:](./images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif)
bittorrent really doesn't become worthwhile until you have at least (as in the abolute minimum of) 2 people downloading a file at the same time, which isn't likely to happen until you get up to 400 downloads or so (guestimating). the overhead incurred by putting the lesser-downloaded videos out via bittorrent is simply not worth it, as it puts more wear and tear on the raid arrays, makes the tracker memory usage go up, increases the number of HTTP requests that must be handled, and wastes bandwidth on the peer-to-peer traffic overhead.
you may also see the following information, if you add the pieces of information together from above...
Code: Select all
videos downloaded more than 200 times:
+-----------+----------+---------------+---------------+
| vid_count | PCT_VIDS | bandwidth | pct_bandwidth |
+-----------+----------+---------------+---------------+
| 185 | 0.51 | 5618453425972 | 19.49 |
+-----------+----------+---------------+---------------+
videos downloaded 200 times or less:
+-----------+----------+----------------+---------------+
| vid_count | PCT_VIDS | bandwidth | pct_bandwidth |
+-----------+----------+----------------+---------------+
| 36163 | 99.49 | 23208493985956 | 80.51 |
+-----------+----------+----------------+---------------+