Orwell wrote:Will we see a return of the old board style eventually?
Scintilla wrote:Any chance we could get the [url] tag tweaked to accept relative paths for space-saving purposes, like url=/video/36860?
Scintilla wrote:And can custom tags still be added? Because ^H jokes don't work nearly as well as strikeout jokes...
Sereenie wrote:That being said, where's the "New posts since last visit" feature? I think it may just have changed names, but I can't find it.
Vivaldi wrote:umm, about the vidid thing, it might be worth pointing out that now every link in the recommended amvs forum is broken. :/
Copycat_Revolver wrote:Otohiko wrote:I love you guys Less so the new icon
They have chins.... Why do they have chins?
Autraya wrote:Seriously tho how much caffine/energy drinks did it take to get it all running again
Autraya wrote:and do you accept payment in pocki for your overtime?
u_queen wrote:(...and we have a friends & foes option.....weird ¬_¬)
Brad wrote:First off, awesome job resurrecting the forums
Now that we're kind of "moving on" so to speak, how about we begin to loosen certain restrictions that have been with us since 2001. Such as, signature height. I'm certainly not in favor of taking out the restrictions all together (if you go to other non-regulated boards, you'll see RIDICULOUSLY huge sigs. Certainly not advocating that). However, we've had this whole, "no bigger than 600x40, but you can have 2 of them" thing in place for a while. So what many people do is just make 2 of them and have them stack for a resulting height of 80. Why not just give up the ghost and say "600x80 total"?
Keep in mind, it's honestly been a long time since I've actually gone through the official forum rules so this may have been changed long ago, but this is how I currently know it. Thoughts?
AIM wrote:jssssperr (1:19:10 AM): you didn't see my post on the front page of that thread
jssssperr (1:19:11 AM):
Atom is OK (1:19:24 AM): damn that was quick :O
Atom is OK (1:19:33 AM): I seriously like, hit submit, 10 seconds later, IM
Nunchuck wrote:I guess it got mentioned before. Are you going to fix the width of the page?
Reading across a widescreen is seriously annoying...
Thanks for the old smilies
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests