Agreed. I said the same thing earlier that what you write and how you back it up is a lot more important. Numbers don't mean anything without an explanation and if you can explain the scoring, what needs improvement, what they do well, etc....they I'd say the numbers don't really matter...EarthCurrent wrote:What people should be striving for is consistency in their scoring.
I created a rubric for myself because I wanted to try to have a framework to work within.
So long as you are not erradic with your style of scoring, and really try and provide honest, helpful explanations about the scores and reasoning behind them; I don't see why the scores/averages people recieve should be that big a deal.
overall
- dwchang
- Sad Boy on Site
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 12:22 am
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
-Daniel
Newest Video: Through the Years and Far Away aka Sad Girl in Space
Newest Video: Through the Years and Far Away aka Sad Girl in Space
- Xanthrax
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 2:40 pm
- Location: Cramlington, Northumberland, England
- Contact:
Post subjects are a waste of time
I pick scores randomly out of a hat and explain accordingly.
Dead girls don't say no.
- OmniStrata
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 4:03 pm
- Status: Wealthy
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Post subjects are a waste of time
you know people, this guy is legendary right?Xanthrax wrote:I pick scores randomly out of a hat and explain accordingly.

"Strength lies in action. Let the weak react to me..." - Kamahl, Pit Fighter from Magic: the Gathering
"That is a mistake many of my enemies make. They think before they act. I act before I think!" - Vortigern from Merlin ('98)
"I AM REBORN!" - Dark Schneider Bastard!! OAV
"That is a mistake many of my enemies make. They think before they act. I act before I think!" - Vortigern from Merlin ('98)
"I AM REBORN!" - Dark Schneider Bastard!! OAV
- mexicanjunior
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2001 11:33 pm
- Status: It's a process...
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
- Mr Pilkington
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:10 pm
- Status: Stay outa my shed
- Location: Well, hey, you, you should stop being over there and be over here!
That's kind of T.S. on their part isn’t it?OmniStrata wrote:Lots of people dislike my 6.XX which comes out when they see my "scores given"
I grade leniently for the most part, but I don't by any means have problems with giving crappy reviews to shitty videos. Yes 5 is average, so if you get a 6 or a 7 don't bitch! Some people don't seem to be happy with my opinions on originality, but If I think it's a "been there don’t that" situation, You'll get a poor score. (IE: Heavy metal vids to scenes of eva violence.) Plus if the anime is used on a regular basis (the big 3 being, in order: DBZ, Evangelion, Trigun) your score drops several points initially, but can and will be won back with new and original concepts. You gotta pull off something serious to impress me. Now quality is kind of a strange situation. I'm used to seeing fansubs in AMVs so I consider divx rips to be average (5). For this reason DVD rips will almost always get 8-10. The rest is kind up to the moment stuff. But reviewability…. if you get a 7+, that means I kept it for my collection. And that's a feat!
Can't be any worse than the scores I would have given myself. Actually I love to hear responces from people I consider AMV l33t.OmniStrata wrote:I'll stomach any video now. The thing is, I get this weird [Ominous?] feeling that people DON'T want me to op them due to my "evil" scoring habits...
- Arigatomina
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:04 am
- Contact:
You know, I wondered that myself. I'm guessing they take all the different scores people get in one category (like originality) and find the average of that for the global. But it could be that they take the average of the 'average given' scores for that category - in which case it would be the average people give, rather than the averages people receive. I know, it sounds odd, but I switched majors before I took Statistics, so I don't know if there's something inherently faulty with taking an average of an average. I bet Dwchang would be able to explain the flaws with that, but it seems like either method would give you different results for the 'global average scores.'Smaklo wrote:explain the global points, not the average the one like recived pts but global, how r they rated and whhhhy?
[Theoretical math is not my strong point.
