VCA Information Deadline Extended

Locked
User avatar
Arigatomina
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:04 am
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Arigatomina » Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:11 pm

SSJVegita0609 wrote:I believe emails were sent out to all members who were in danger of being DQed...
Not that I know of - from the ones now surprised at having been disqualified.

The only two people I know who were sought out and warned were the better creators not aware of the VCA qualification list - the ones for whom the deadline was extended because they couldn't be found and warned in time.

User avatar
Castor Troy
Ryan Molina, A.C.E
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2001 8:45 pm
Status: Retired from AMVs
Location: California
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Castor Troy » Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:17 pm

SSJVegita0609 wrote:I believe emails were sent out to all members who were in danger of being DQed...
I didn't get nuthin.
"You're ignoring everything, except what you want to hear.." - jbone

User avatar
Arigatomina
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:04 am
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Arigatomina » Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:30 pm

Another question/proposal - participation.

It's called the viewer's choice awards. Then why are people disqualifed from voting just because their vids are disqualified? Without their vids being counted, wouldn't that make them viewers? Is participation limited to creators?

I really don't see why someone not wanting their vids to be included in the contest (by leaving the box unchecked) can't still be a viewer making a choice in the contest. The double disqualification for amv creators doesn't seem fair if people who don't make vids can still vote.

User avatar
Castor Troy
Ryan Molina, A.C.E
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2001 8:45 pm
Status: Retired from AMVs
Location: California
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Castor Troy » Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:39 pm

Arigatomyna wrote:Another question/proposal - participation.

It's called the viewer's choice awards. Then why are people disqualifed from voting just because their vids are disqualified? Without their vids being counted, wouldn't that make them viewers? Is participation limited to creators?

I really don't see why someone not wanting their vids to be included in the contest (by leaving the box unchecked) can't still be a viewer making a choice in the contest. The double disqualification for amv creators doesn't seem fair if people who don't make vids can still vote.
Agreed.

While I don't really care about being nominated, it bugs me that I can't nomimate the videos I feel deserving. :cry:
"You're ignoring everything, except what you want to hear.." - jbone

User avatar
Katsumi_AMVs
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 8:05 pm
Location: Where I'm not supposed to be
Org Profile

Post by Katsumi_AMVs » Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:42 pm

Castor Troy wrote:
Arigatomyna wrote:Another question/proposal - participation.

It's called the viewer's choice awards. Then why are people disqualifed from voting just because their vids are disqualified? Without their vids being counted, wouldn't that make them viewers? Is participation limited to creators?

I really don't see why someone not wanting their vids to be included in the contest (by leaving the box unchecked) can't still be a viewer making a choice in the contest. The double disqualification for amv creators doesn't seem fair if people who don't make vids can still vote.
Agreed.

While I don't really care about being nominated, it bugs me that I can't nomimate the videos I feel deserving. :cry:
X 2
Nothing usefull here .

trythil
is
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
Location: N????????????????
Org Profile

Post by trythil » Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:53 pm

Castor Troy wrote:
Arigatomyna wrote:Another question/proposal - participation.

It's called the viewer's choice awards. Then why are people disqualifed from voting just because their vids are disqualified? Without their vids being counted, wouldn't that make them viewers? Is participation limited to creators?

I really don't see why someone not wanting their vids to be included in the contest (by leaving the box unchecked) can't still be a viewer making a choice in the contest. The double disqualification for amv creators doesn't seem fair if people who don't make vids can still vote.
Agreed.

While I don't really care about being nominated, it bugs me that I can't nomimate the videos I feel deserving. :cry:
Hey, I'm fine with it :)

User avatar
SSJVegita0609
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Around...
Org Profile

Post by SSJVegita0609 » Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:06 am

Paulo wrote:
Castor Troy wrote:
Arigatomyna wrote:Another question/proposal - participation.

It's called the viewer's choice awards. Then why are people disqualifed from voting just because their vids are disqualified? Without their vids being counted, wouldn't that make them viewers? Is participation limited to creators?

I really don't see why someone not wanting their vids to be included in the contest (by leaving the box unchecked) can't still be a viewer making a choice in the contest. The double disqualification for amv creators doesn't seem fair if people who don't make vids can still vote.
Agreed.

While I don't really care about being nominated, it bugs me that I can't nomimate the videos I feel deserving. :cry:
X 2
^10

That strikes me as absolutely ridiculous.

Anyways Ari, I know a few people who got emails who weren't really known, which is my reasoning behind my eariler claim. As for people who didn't recieve emails, they should probably check their spam filters, I've heard of org emails not getting through due tot that particular issue.
The best effects are the ones you don't notice.

User avatar
Corran
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:40 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Corran » Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:47 am

Arigatomyna wrote:Another question/proposal - participation.

It's called the viewer's choice awards. Then why are people disqualifed from voting just because their vids are disqualified? Without their vids being counted, wouldn't that make them viewers? Is participation limited to creators?

I really don't see why someone not wanting their vids to be included in the contest (by leaving the box unchecked) can't still be a viewer making a choice in the contest. The double disqualification for amv creators doesn't seem fair if people who don't make vids can still vote.
No words or mathematical equations can convey how much I agree with this post.

User avatar
SQ
Doesn't have a title
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:11 pm
Status: youtube.com/SQ
Location: Upstate NY
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by SQ » Tue Jan 20, 2004 10:30 am

SSJVegita0609 wrote:I believe emails were sent out to all members who were in danger of being DQed...
You must be one of those "Better" editors, Vegita, because I sure didn't get an email and I'm sitting here disqualified. Feel my happiness right here, vegita.

Feel it.
Discord: @standardquip (Vars)
BentoVid.com

User avatar
istiv
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 2:35 am
Location: GUADELOUPE
Org Profile

Post by istiv » Tue Jan 20, 2004 10:53 am

So do i

my status became suddenly on January 18th unqualifying (all things was "NO" before), i've tried to delete the unqualifying vids when i saw that and admin refused and the day after all my vids were disqualified... i didn't received any mail

i posted, here and PM an admin, they didn't answer me ...

what do you want ! there is a small circle of "best creators" here for wich deadlines are extended, but we're apparently not part of these ....

Locked

Return to “Site Announcements”