
Personal Alchemist
Forum rules
Please observe the following unique rules for this forum:
Please observe the following unique rules for this forum:
- Please limit your new threads (not replies) to one per week. If you have several new videos to announce, create one thread for all the videos. (Note: if you forget one you can edit your post!)
- Offsite links are allowed, but you are required to have a catalog entry for that video as well. Threads announcing videos that do not contain a catalog entry will be moved to the Awaiting Catalog Entry sub-forum and will be deleted in 2 weeks if an entry is not created.
- When posting announcements, it is recommended that you include links to the catalog entries (using the video ID) in your post.
- Videos that do not contain anime are allowed to be announced in the Other Videos section and are not required to have catalog entries.
- OtakuForLife
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 3:37 pm
- Status: In relationship
- Location: Endsvill (North Providence, RI , USA)
- BauziOLD
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:16 am
- Location: Austria (uhm the other country without kangaroos^^)
- Contact:
- TheJadeArcAngel
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:38 pm
<___< yeeeeeeea apparently the .mov situation is one of those chipper lessons I've come to learn and I am sorry it's at the expense of you not being able to watch the video X_X'''.-Bauzi- wrote:Uhm... Which audio codec did you use?
I can´t play the audio stream with VLC and well... I´m not willed to install Quick Time, because I really don´t like it.
Next time XviD please ;_; Anyway: Editing looks good even without sound.
I am working to have an .AVI version up to replace the .MOV one!
Again, apologies but hey, at least the visuals are good...ish?

- BauziOLD
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:16 am
- Location: Austria (uhm the other country without kangaroos^^)
- Contact:
I hope that this was a joke. *caught*
Maybe I give you an op if it works, but:
-It would be an average 5 for visual quality (and this isn´t good)
-320x240 (I guess that there could be more in it
)
-Filesize is for this ressolution too big and the visual quality too bad.
The cut looks good, but sry not the visual. There is alot to improve. I´m sure that the visual quality comes
Maybe I give you an op if it works, but:
-It would be an average 5 for visual quality (and this isn´t good)
-320x240 (I guess that there could be more in it

-Filesize is for this ressolution too big and the visual quality too bad.
The cut looks good, but sry not the visual. There is alot to improve. I´m sure that the visual quality comes

- TheJadeArcAngel
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 2:38 pm
Currently my largest problem is that I have had no clue what a "normal" quality/file-size/format/etc... might be. After seeing other movies and now haveing access to players, encoders, etc... I dont want that to be a problem any more-Bauzi- wrote:I hope that this was a joke. *caught*
Maybe I give you an op if it works, but:
-It would be an average 5 for visual quality (and this isn´t good)
-320x240 (I guess that there could be more in it)
-Filesize is for this ressolution too big and the visual quality too bad.
The cut looks good, but sry not the visual. There is alot to improve. I´m sure that the visual quality comes

- sagarajack
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:34 am