How do u make AMVs without the Windows Movie Maker?

Locked
User avatar
Orwell
godx, Son of godix
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:14 am
Location: Frying Pan. Destination: Fire.
Org Profile

Post by Orwell » Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:03 am

That's why you don't even bother scanning the clips, just use a bit of math and figure out how long frames 12000-13000 are going to be and go from there. Observe final output. Attach appropriate music.
Latest
[Kristyrat]: Vote for Orwell
[Kristyrat]: because train conducters are dicks.
Otohiko: whereas Germans are like "god we are all so horrible, we're going to die a pointless death now."

User avatar
Keeper of Hellfire
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 am
Location: Germany
Org Profile

Post by Keeper of Hellfire » Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:51 am

Pwolf wrote:and ram really doesn't improve editing all that much (to a degree). a processor upgrade has more of an effect then getting more ram.
Be carefull with such an absolute statement. Depending on the system configuration, adding more RAM can have more effect for editing than upgrading the CPU. The less RAM is installed the more effect has adding RAM because the use of virtual memory will slow down your system more than a CPU-upgrade can compensate. Replacing 256MB SD-RAM with 512 MB DDR-RAM gave my editing a real speed increase and it raised the stability. It was comparable with the increase that I got from replacing the 1.2 GHz Duron with an AthlonXP-M 2600+. The speed increase from adding additional 512MB was much less remarkable, but it helps if many or complex effects are applied. For some effects even the 1 GB is too less, but it's the limit of my mainboard.

User avatar
Pwolf
Friendly Neighborhood Pwaffle
Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 4:17 pm
Location: Some where in California, I forgot :\
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Pwolf » Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:15 am

thats why i said "to a degree" if you have 256mb of ram, upgrading to 1gb is going to help. but if you already have like 512mb to 1gb, then it wont be as significant like you said. Before i upgraded my CPU i upgraded to 2gb from 1gb and i had very little, noticeable, performance gain. sure i could do more without hitting the page file but again, not much. now I'm back to 1gb and my performance with the new cpu is much much much better.

more memory is great, but if you have to wait for the system to render out the frame(s) anyway, more ram isn't going to help you. thats my opinion.

Pwolf

User avatar
Taruto!
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:45 pm
Location: England
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Taruto! » Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:31 am

On the topic of running large programs on low amounts of ram.. it's all a matter of patience from my experiences..
My older computer, laggy as hell with very little ram (not sure how much..), can still run and edit things, it just takes a little longer to load whatever I do. :/

More ram is as said definately a good thing, but it doesn't really limit editing that much. :shock:

User avatar
Kionon
I ♥ the 80's
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 10:13 pm
Status: Ayukawa MODoka.
Location: I wonder if you know how they live in Tokyo... DRIFT, DRIFT, DRIFT
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Kionon » Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:11 pm

I made Utena (Story of a Girl) and Arima to Miyazawa on a 300Mhz Celeron Processor with 64MB of RAM (a 1999 Campaq Presario), and it ran Premiere 6 just fine.

I had quality issues with ripping DVDs and capturing footage, but the editing was easy enough.
ImageImage
That YouTube Thing.

User avatar
Gox777
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: Deltona, FL
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Gox777 » Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:40 pm

Kionon wrote:I made Utena (Story of a Girl) and Arima to Miyazawa on a 300Mhz Celeron Processor with 64MB of RAM (a 1999 Campaq Presario), and it ran Premiere 6 just fine.

I had quality issues with ripping DVDs and capturing footage, but the editing was easy enough.
I applaud^
My 333Mhz Celeron couldn't even playback video files.
Only thing it was good for was Starcraft.

PrincessofAnime13
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:28 pm
Org Profile

Post by PrincessofAnime13 » Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:39 pm

sirvayza wrote:it's painstaking without a newer machine because of RAM needs and overall system performance demands. but you can try an older version of adobe premiere, something like 6.0 maybe. but you'd be better off asking Santa for a new computer.
I don't believe in Santa anymore. I stopped since i was 7. -_-

ssj_100
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 12:17 pm
Location: New York City
Org Profile

Post by ssj_100 » Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:41 pm

if your pc has like 512 gb of ram and about 800mhz, that should be ok with abobe 6.0 and a little patience.

User avatar
AMV_4000
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2002 6:29 am
Location: USA
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by AMV_4000 » Mon Nov 27, 2006 12:58 am

ssj_100 wrote:if your pc has like 512 gb of ram and about 800mhz, that should be ok with abobe 6.0 and a little patience.
i wish i had 512 GB of ram... but 512 MB would work just fine

I used to edit on a 700 mhz P3, 256 mb ram comp, runing premeire 6.0 just fine!
i upgraded last year to a 1 ghz athalon 512 MB ram comp... ran premiere 6.0, after effects 5.5 and more just fine.
i now edit on my laptop running a 1.9 ghz sempron 512 mb ram running premeire 6.5, after effects 5.5 and much much more... just fine!

little patience goes a long way!

Locked

Return to “Video & Audio Help”