Pro vs. older versions?
- SQ
- Doesn't have a title
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:11 pm
- Status: youtube.com/SQ
- Location: Upstate NY
- Contact:
Sorry for hijacking this thread, but what's the deal with audio, timecode, stills, and in-built special effects? Are these any different between 6.x and Premiere Pro 2?
I heard stills were better handled in Pro, and that was the only reason I bothered thinking about upgrading. But I also heard a nasty rumor that rubberbands were no more(But people said there weren't rubber bands in FCP either, and there are, so.... 0o)?
And I'm wondering if it's Pro 2 that automatically synchs timecodes between different cameras(since I will be using Premiere for more than just AMVs), of if I got that mixed up with some other editing program?
Oh, and how is the export feature broken? Any more broken than Premiere 6.x, where you had to pull it through Vdub anyway?
I heard stills were better handled in Pro, and that was the only reason I bothered thinking about upgrading. But I also heard a nasty rumor that rubberbands were no more(But people said there weren't rubber bands in FCP either, and there are, so.... 0o)?
And I'm wondering if it's Pro 2 that automatically synchs timecodes between different cameras(since I will be using Premiere for more than just AMVs), of if I got that mixed up with some other editing program?
Oh, and how is the export feature broken? Any more broken than Premiere 6.x, where you had to pull it through Vdub anyway?
- Scintilla
- (for EXTREME)
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:47 pm
- Status: Quo
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Not true. Rubberbands are still there; you just have to change the track view settings to see them. Personally, I never use them anymore anyway; I find it faster to keyframe opacity values directly in the Effect Controls window.SQ wrote:But I also heard a nasty rumor that rubberbands were no more(But people said there weren't rubber bands in FCP either, and there are, so.... 0o)?
- Willen
- Now in Hi-Def!
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:50 am
- Status: Melancholy
- Location: SOS-Dan HQ
Unless you are working with Hi-Def video (HDV, DVCPRO HD, HDCAM, XDCAM HD, etc.), upgrading to Pro 2.0 isn't a must. Even then, most of the HD source captures require third party software/hardware.
You'd probably want to download the trial from Adobe and check those things out yourself (rubberbands, timecode sync, and image support).
You'd probably want to download the trial from Adobe and check those things out yourself (rubberbands, timecode sync, and image support).
- SQ
- Doesn't have a title
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 8:11 pm
- Status: youtube.com/SQ
- Location: Upstate NY
- Contact:
-
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:43 pm
- Location: TN
- Contact:
Lemme know if pro handles 24p good in case I get a Canon XL2...
As of right now I use Premiere 6.5 for basic editing, AE 7.0 for anything else + final output for virtualdubmod encoding. I just like the light and fluffyness of 6.5 as opposed to pro...true pro does a lot more and it's interpolations and fx are waaay nicer than the older premiere, but I never used any of the effects (about the only thing i'd use is cross dissolve) in premiere.
my $.02
As of right now I use Premiere 6.5 for basic editing, AE 7.0 for anything else + final output for virtualdubmod encoding. I just like the light and fluffyness of 6.5 as opposed to pro...true pro does a lot more and it's interpolations and fx are waaay nicer than the older premiere, but I never used any of the effects (about the only thing i'd use is cross dissolve) in premiere.
my $.02
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
Pretty much any codec that doesn't come standard with windows will give you borked output. So basically you can't use huffyuv or lagarith. Your only export options are really either uncompressed or the debugmode frameserver.SQ wrote:Oh, and how is the export feature broken? Any more broken than Premiere 6.x, where you had to pull it through Vdub anyway?
When I say broken, that can mean anything from garbage appearing around the top or bottom of the frame, frames being encoded in the wrong order, or the output file being corrupt.
- AMV_4000
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2002 6:29 am
- Location: USA
- Contact:
dont forget your amv hell CE output... that was the most awsome display of, reasons to stay away from pro, that i've ever seen!Zarxrax wrote:Pretty much any codec that doesn't come standard with windows will give you borked output. So basically you can't use huffyuv or lagarith. Your only export options are really either uncompressed or the debugmode frameserver.SQ wrote:Oh, and how is the export feature broken? Any more broken than Premiere 6.x, where you had to pull it through Vdub anyway?
When I say broken, that can mean anything from garbage appearing around the top or bottom of the frame, frames being encoded in the wrong order, or the output file being corrupt.
- Scintilla
- (for EXTREME)
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:47 pm
- Status: Quo
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
... What? I've exported HuffYUV files from Premiere Pro many times without problems like that occurring.Zarxrax wrote:Pretty much any codec that doesn't come standard with windows will give you borked output. So basically you can't use huffyuv or lagarith. Your only export options are really either uncompressed or the debugmode frameserver.SQ wrote:Oh, and how is the export feature broken? Any more broken than Premiere 6.x, where you had to pull it through Vdub anyway?
When I say broken, that can mean anything from garbage appearing around the top or bottom of the frame, frames being encoded in the wrong order, or the output file being corrupt.
The only problems I have are when the export just stops before it's done and the ETA runs down to zero and when I cancel the program freezes, but those can almost always be solved by CHECKING "Optimize stills".
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
- dowhatnow
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:24 pm
- Location: Nowhere of interest
I'm kinda curious myself as to whether the upgrade to Pro and the addition of the latest After Effects is worth the money/time involved. In any case, I don't have enough money for either one by themselves, let alone both.
A little off topic, but I'm wondering if there's any way I could get the Audio/Visual effects of Pro into 6.0.
A little off topic, but I'm wondering if there's any way I could get the Audio/Visual effects of Pro into 6.0.