Do we really need to go over how nothing has actually been stolen?Dannywilson wrote:we have been stealing from musicians and anime companies
Piracy and Theft [split]
- Dannywilson
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 5:36 am
- Location: In love with Dr. Girlfriend
So, as you can see, we're using something for which someone is entitled to payment, without paying for it.US Copyright Law wrote:TITLE 17 > CHAPTER 2 > § 202
§ 202. Ownership of copyright as distinct from ownership of material object:
Ownership of a copyright, or of any of the exclusive rights under a copyright, is distinct from ownership of any material object in which the work is embodied. Transfer of ownership of any material object, including the copy or phonorecord in which the work is first fixed, does not of itself convey any rights in the copyrighted work embodied in the object; nor, in the absence of an agreement, does transfer of ownership of a copyright or of any exclusive rights under a copyright convey property rights in any material object.
TITLE 17 > CHAPTER 10 > SUBCHAPTER C > § 1003
§ 1003. Obligation to make royalty payments:
(a) Prohibition on Importation and Manufacture.— No person shall import into and distribute, or manufacture and distribute, any digital audio recording device or digital audio recording medium unless such person records the notice specified by this section and subsequently deposits the statements of account and applicable royalty payments for such device or medium specified in section 1004.
(b) Filing of Notice.— The importer or manufacturer of any digital audio recording device or digital audio recording medium, within a product category or utilizing a technology with respect to which such manufacturer or importer has not previously filed a notice under this subsection, shall file with the Register of Copyrights a notice with respect to such device or medium, in such form and content as the Register shall prescribe by regulation.
(c) Filing of Quarterly and Annual Statements of Account.—
(1) Generally.— Any importer or manufacturer that distributes any digital audio recording device or digital audio recording medium that it manufactured or imported shall file with the Register of Copyrights, in such form and content as the Register shall prescribe by regulation, such quarterly and annual statements of account with respect to such distribution as the Register shall prescribe by regulation.
TITLE 17 > CHAPTER 10 > SUBCHAPTER C > § 1006
§ 1006. Entitlement to royalty payments:
(a) Interested Copyright Parties.— The royalty payments deposited pursuant to section 1005 shall, in accordance with the procedures specified in section 1007, be distributed to any interested copyright party—
(1) whose musical work or sound recording has been—
(A) embodied in a digital musical recording or an analog musical recording lawfully made under this title that has been distributed, and
(B) distributed in the form of digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings or disseminated to the public in transmissions, during the period to which such payments pertain; and
(2) who has filed a claim under section 1007.
Stealing.
"in the morning when i have wood..i like to walk around my house and bump random shit with it.... " -Random comment on grouphug.us
- Maverick-Rubik
- The Eye of a Lynx
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 8:49 pm
- Kalium
- Sir Bugsalot
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:17 pm
- Location: Plymouth, Michigan
Piracy is not theft. Theft applies to physic objects and physical objects only. Theft is when person A takes something from person B, which deprives person B of the use of the object or possession in question. Piracy does not work like that.Dannywilson wrote:So, as you can see, we're using something for which someone is entitled to payment, without paying for it.
Stealing.
Get your definitions straight. Piracy =/= theft.
- Kusoyaro
- LEGENDARY!!!
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2001 10:03 pm
- Location: HOT FUCKING
- Contact:
- Brad
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2000 9:32 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
So, therefore, identity theft is actually identity piracy, and isn't illegal. I see. Please tell that to the thousands of people who are victims of it every year.Kalium wrote:Piracy is not theft. Theft applies to physic objects and physical objects only. Theft is when person A takes something from person B, which deprives person B of the use of the object or possession in question. Piracy does not work like that.
Get your definitions straight. Piracy =/= theft.
Data = Information
Information = Property
Stealing Property = Theft
Either way, I second the motion for a lock.
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
Well the U.S. Supreme Court said that copyright infringement is not theft. So if you got beef, take it up with them.AtomX wrote:So, therefore, identity theft is actually identity piracy, and isn't illegal. I see. Please tell that to the thousands of people who are victims of it every year.Kalium wrote:Piracy is not theft. Theft applies to physic objects and physical objects only. Theft is when person A takes something from person B, which deprives person B of the use of the object or possession in question. Piracy does not work like that.
Get your definitions straight. Piracy =/= theft.
Data = Information
Information = Property
Stealing Property = Theft
-
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2002 10:59 pm
- Location: Vineland, NJ
- Contact:
- Otohiko
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:32 pm
If the 'owner' asks me to remove my 'stolen' works from download, I'll say OK to that.
But the RIAA is not the creative owner, and I don't accept their authority, period.
But the RIAA is not the creative owner, and I don't accept their authority, period.
The Birds are using humanity in order to throw something terrifying at this green pig. And then what happens to us all later, that’s simply not important to them…