Statement: Windows Movie Maker is not ment for making AMV's

Gemberkoekje · Post by **Gemberkoekje** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:08 am

I was thinking - i think WMM is not ment for heavy duty work like making hi-quality AMV's is. I think it's more ment for fathers who have some nice home-shot films of how his son/daughter takes his first steps, learns to swim and ride (and kills him/herself in a car accident

) and want to create a nice vid with effects to show uncles and aunties...

*p.s. Please don't answer with yes or no - add something to the discussion or don't bother

*

Cyanna · Post by **Cyanna** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:15 am

Well I doubt that the folks at Adobe had AMVs in mind when they created Premire either.

Gemberkoekje · Post by **Gemberkoekje** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:01 am

True, they had big companies in mind using the program for hi-quality vireo editing...

Guess AMV making falls somewhere in the middle, ne?

bum · Post by **bum** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:35 am

Windows movie maker is made for editing video. Making amv's is editing video. This thread is stupid.

Torchlight · Post by **Torchlight** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:10 pm

wmm is a fine alternative to a higher end editor if you dont have big bucks to spend and you just want to do simple cuts, as long as you know how to use it

SuperFusion · Post by **SuperFusion** » Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:10 pm

bum wrote: this thread is stupid.

I agree.

[MOD42: Yes it is.]