Video doesn't look same when I download it

Locked
Neelick
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:58 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Video doesn't look same when I download it

Post by Neelick » Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:41 am

I've successfully uploaded 2 videos to a-m-v.org but when I download the video, the video is choppy and it doesn't look right.

Am I doing something wrong? And if so what?

User avatar
Iamshadowkiller
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2001 11:40 pm
Status: Pending
Location: Your Mother
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Iamshadowkiller » Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:42 am

Hmmm....

I strongly doubt that the upload or download process is the cause..

when you did the final encode on your vids, did you watch them all the way through?
I would guess that maaaaybe somehow if you had a really bad connection you might get some small portion a bit messed up...but all signs here seem to be pointing to a bad encode...

/me checks your amvs

alright, both mpg...perhaps if you gave a brief description of what you did in the last encoding process..or maybe even the beggining stages...or also, perhaps someone who doesn't have 56ghey will download the vids and tell you exactly what is wrong...perhaps

/end :P
Oh how convenient. A theory about God that doesn't require looking through a telescope.

Neelick
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:58 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Neelick » Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:18 am

I have watched both videos all the way through in their entirity. Both are fine on the file I have that I uploaded, but the version I downloaded they don't seem right.

Is there something that a-m-v.org does maybe some sort of compression or something?

User avatar
derobert
Phantom of the .Org
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2001 8:35 am
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by derobert » Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:27 am

Neelick wrote:Is there something that a-m-v.org does maybe some sort of compression or something?
No. The video you downloaded should be bit-for-bit identical to the one you uploaded.

Use a file comparison tool to check.
Key 55EA59FE; fingerprint = E501 CEE3 E030 2D48 D449 274C FB3F 88C2 55EA 59FE
A mighty order of ages is born anew.              http://twitter.com/derobert

Neelick
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:58 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Neelick » Wed Nov 24, 2004 10:57 am

I didn't run a bit comparison but the file size is the exact same size. I don't even have any software to do that.

It doesn't make much sense to me.

User avatar
derobert
Phantom of the .Org
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2001 8:35 am
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by derobert » Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:10 pm

Neelick wrote:I didn't run a bit comparison but the file size is the exact same size. I don't even have any software to do that.
Find one to check --- sometimes files get corrupted in transfer due to, e.g., defective hardware.
Key 55EA59FE; fingerprint = E501 CEE3 E030 2D48 D449 274C FB3F 88C2 55EA 59FE
A mighty order of ages is born anew.              http://twitter.com/derobert

trythil
is
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
Location: N????????????????
Org Profile

Post by trythil » Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:21 pm

Neelick wrote:I didn't run a bit comparison but the file size is the exact same size. I don't even have any software to do that.

It doesn't make much sense to me.
Try checksumming the files -- you can find checksum utilities all over the place. A good, freely available one (it's on every GNU/Linux system I've used, anyway) is md5sum.

On hash functions: CRC32 works in most cases. MD5 is better, but much slower. SHA1 is probably overkill for this purpose.

Locked

Return to “Site Help & Feedback”