***
As for 'alternative', I think there was a definition before... crap, I forgot most of the bands that were brought up, but basically think 90's not-too-heavy, somewhat-punk-influenced somewhat-pop-like rock music...
I don't have to name everyone do I?Otohiko wrote:And Kai? And like... a bunch of other people?
Not necessarily. Personally, I don't use that "East coast- West coast" description, because it gets too confusing...especially since there are plenty of bands from both coasts that sound like they're from the other, and plenty of bands that live nowhere near any coast, or not even in this country. Also, your "first type" sounds like emo-core...which in my opinion, isn't good, because every band sounds like every other band(Poison the Well sounds just like Atreyu sounds just like A Static Lullaby sounds just like Beloved sounds just like Hopesfall...and so on and so forth). I personally try to describe a band based on how it sounds...usually, I also include where they're from, simply because it's like a rule. Of course, then you have the problem of getting caught up in labels...but eh, that's what the firebombs are here for.el_farlo wrote: Today's hardcore bands are tighter and much heavier, and can be divided into two general types (usually called East Coast or West Coast, for where the band is, but it's not always consistent). The first type are smoother, with heavy grooves that flow, with a vocalist that sings (or at least tries to) or shouts. The second type is heavier, with tight, stop-and-go rhythms and harsh vocals that are a cross between shouts and low screams.