Whats the best codec?
- Shiroi Kumo
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 6:22 pm
- Location: Your Basement
Whats the best codec?
I'm using Premiere 6.5 and I would like to know what is the best codec to use when exporting?
... And I'm also very sorry if this question has been asked a million times before.
... And I'm also very sorry if this question has been asked a million times before.
Cold-hearted orb that rules the night
Removes the colors from our sight
Red is grey and yellow white
But we decide which is right
... and which is an illusion
Removes the colors from our sight
Red is grey and yellow white
But we decide which is right
... and which is an illusion
- SS5_Majin_Bebi
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 8:07 pm
- Location: Why? So you can pretend you care? (Brisbane, Australia)
Re: Whats the best codec?
Use Huffyuv to export from premiere, and then compress it with XviD in VirtualDub. This is all explained in the guides that are linked to from the main page.Shiroi Kumo wrote:I'm using Premiere 6.5 and I would like to know what is the best codec to use when exporting?
... And I'm also very sorry if this question has been asked a million times before.
- jonmartensen
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 11:50 pm
- Location: Gimmickville USA
- Scintilla
- (for EXTREME)
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:47 pm
- Status: Quo
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Seconded. Using Windows Media Encoder with the WMV9 codec, I've found I can produce videos that look like the same quality as my XviDs, at only a slightly larger file size. I think the difference might be due to the fact that I haven't been able to get WME to accept AVS scripts like VDubMod can; I haven't tried using MakeAVIs or whatever the program's called.bum wrote:wmv9 is prety good, despite what alot of people say.
- SS5_Majin_Bebi
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 8:07 pm
- Location: Why? So you can pretend you care? (Brisbane, Australia)
Well whats the point of WMV9 if it yields the same quality as a comparitive XviD encode at a higher filesize? If XviD has a lower filesize, then its the smarter choice, especially if its the same or better quality. Really, I dont know why people insist on catering to people who are too ignorant to notice that microsoft, all its affiliations and products (including video and audio codecs and renderers) SUCK. If they didnt, you wouldnt have to go around downloading third party plugins for every shittly little thing you wanted to do. Sadly, M$ has the monopoly on the market, so unless you want to use MAC, or put in the effort to learn Linux, you're fuckin screwed.Scintilla wrote:Seconded. Using Windows Media Encoder with the WMV9 codec, I've found I can produce videos that look like the same quality as my XviDs, at only a slightly larger file size. I think the difference might be due to the fact that I haven't been able to get WME to accept AVS scripts like VDubMod can; I haven't tried using MakeAVIs or whatever the program's called.bum wrote:wmv9 is prety good, despite what alot of people say.
Stick with XviD, and use ffdshow as the decoder. Its faster and yields better quality with the right settings.
- Scintilla
- (for EXTREME)
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:47 pm
- Status: Quo
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Um, read what I say. I said it was GOOD. I never said that I actually USE it for online distro.SS5_Majin_Bebi wrote:Well whats the point of WMV9 if it yields the same quality as a comparitive XviD encode at a higher filesize? If XviD has a lower filesize, then its the smarter choice, especially if its the same or better quality. Really, I dont know why people insist on catering to people who are too ignorant to notice that microsoft, all its affiliations and products (including video and audio codecs and renderers) SUCK. If they didnt, you wouldnt have to go around downloading third party plugins for every shittly little thing you wanted to do.Scintilla wrote:Seconded. Using Windows Media Encoder with the WMV9 codec, I've found I can produce videos that look like the same quality as my XviDs, at only a slightly larger file size. I think the difference might be due to the fact that I haven't been able to get WME to accept AVS scripts like VDubMod can; I haven't tried using MakeAVIs or whatever the program's called.bum wrote:wmv9 is prety good, despite what alot of people say.
You'll find that all my locally hosted videos are DivX-compatible XviD, and all my directly-linked ones are MPEG-1. No one here's "catering", so calm down.
I didn't realize until after I made that post that I had forgotten to mention the compatibility issues.
- SS5_Majin_Bebi
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2002 8:07 pm
- Location: Why? So you can pretend you care? (Brisbane, Australia)
haha, lol dont worry, I wasnt pissed off or anything, I was just saying that alot of people seem to be scared to get out from under the microsoft "comfort blanket" (which is actually rather uncomfortable
... go figure ) Jeez, when I started doing this like...2 years ago I was the same. I just dont like when they are catered too, like when people actually go to the effort of using a lower grade form of compression just to keep a few whiners happy. Wasn't saying that you were doing that either.
so dont panic.
so dont panic.
- RathNatakaru
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:04 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
- CaTaClYsM
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 3:54 am
RV9 dominates didgital anime but falls into mediocrity with hand drawn. I don't quite understand how it works but take anime didgital anime, be it Kids story from the Animatrix or Love Hina and you can get video quality that utterly stomps XVID or DIVX.
So in other words, one part of the community is waging war on another part of the community because they take their community seriously enough to want to do so. Then they tell the powerless side to get over the loss cause it's just an online community. I'm glad people make so much sense." -- Tab


