About Video Interlacing From DVDs

DJ_Izumi · Post by **DJ_Izumi** » Sat Nov 15, 2003 8:06 pm

Well, I figured TV shows would be 30fps, since they're ment for, ya know, Television.

Dispite the arrise of wide screen TV shows in recent years.

Movies could be encoded at 24fps from the original film reels or digital master... Assuming they get masters like that, sometimes it seems that the american companies get S-VHS cassettes that arrived in North America after riding across the Ocean in the landing gear housing of an Air Japan 747, and skittered across the runway durning landing in France, before being drivin by truck to Mexico and smuggled across the US/Mexico boarder cleverly disguised as cocain.

NME · Post by **NME** » Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:35 pm

I can't go a day without my cocain.

JCD · Post by **JCD** » Sun Nov 16, 2003 11:47 am

ErMaC wrote:6 frames less that you can sync means very little. It you NEED those 6 extra frames because you HAVE to have cuts on all of them, you're a crack monkey or something and are making an epilepsy video.

Propably I am, cause it really makes a difference while editing (not with timing) and I found it easier while editing a really fast video. This is especially noticable when doing fast flashes

For moderate and solw videos I found 24 working better.

trythil · Post by **trythil** » Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:41 pm

JCD wrote:
ErMaC wrote:6 frames less that you can sync means very little. It you NEED those 6 extra frames because you HAVE to have cuts on all of them, you're a crack monkey or something and are making an epilepsy video.
Propably I am, cause it really makes a difference while editing (not with timing) and I found it easier while editing a really fast video. This is especially noticable when doing fast flashes
For moderate and solw videos I found 24 working better.

If you really need that extra 0.0083 seconds of precision to sync up cuts or strobes, I'm not sure if anyone would really want to watch such a video anyway.

JCD · Post by **JCD** » Sun Nov 16, 2003 3:12 pm

trythil wrote: If you really need that extra 0.0083 seconds of precision to sync up cuts or strobes, I'm not sure if anyone would really want to watch such a video anyway.

You misunderstood (or I explained wrong)

I meant the difference between 24 fps and 29,97 / 30 fps editing.