Somebody should mention few facts to Bush

SS5_Majin_Bebi · Post by **SS5_Majin_Bebi** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:10 pm

skanks wrote:
Lyrs wrote:Bush bashing again....
ere in Australia when we go out Bush Bashing it means we take a 4wd out into the bush and ripp it up off road.

Although, somehow I imagine the American version is more entertaining.

But say what you want about your President, cause as bad as he is ours is still spending all his time kissing his arse.

John Howard - The eternal pint sized ass kissing fucking brown nosed politician.

Gaikotsu · Post by **Gaikotsu** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:18 pm

SS5_Majin_Bebi wrote:
Propyro wrote:heh, which one the jello?

[/|\]
That one too.

You seen the one where Bush is seemingly very interested by what he can see froma little bunker with a pair of high powered binoculars, til you notice HE STILL HAS THE FUCKING LENS CAPS ON??? Good times.

It's not as bad as when he waved to Stevie Wonder...

SS5_Majin_Bebi · Post by **SS5_Majin_Bebi** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:32 pm

Gaikotsu wrote:
SS5_Majin_Bebi wrote:
Propyro wrote:heh, which one the jello?

[/|\]
That one too.

You seen the one where Bush is seemingly very interested by what he can see froma little bunker with a pair of high powered binoculars, til you notice HE STILL HAS THE FUCKING LENS CAPS ON??? Good times.
It's not as bad as when he waved to Stevie Wonder...

Or when he fell off that Segway thingy...hehe, fucking retard.

chaoticstormbringer · Post by **chaoticstormbringer** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 9:38 pm

AMEN to that.
Everyone should vote for me, a vote for me is a vote for Anime and Anarchy

SS5_Majin_Bebi · Post by **SS5_Majin_Bebi** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 9:42 pm

chaoticstormbringer wrote:AMEN to that.
Everyone should vote for me, a vote for me is a vote for Anime and Anarchy

do do do, I'm happy again, hehehe....

You're prophetic, dude. Very prophetic. Oh BTW, you forgot to get the driver CD for the scanner you lent me. Its ok though, I d/l'd them from the HP website.

madmallard · Post by **madmallard** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 10:22 pm

Kay, CIA special adviser on WMD, Head of survey group over iraq

snow, interviewer.
-------------

SNOW: One of the things that you found, for instance, is the Mukhabarat, the secret service, in fact had a vigorous weapons program of its own. Tell us about it.

KAY: Well, we have found right now — and we're still finding them — over two dozen laboratories that were hidden in the Iraqi intelligence service, the Mukhabarat, were not declared to the U.N., had prohibited equipment, and carried on activities that should have been declared. Now, at the minimum, they kept alive Iraq's capability to produce both biological and chemical weapons. We found assassination tools. So we know that, in fact, they had a prohibited intent to them.

24 laboratories. None of them declared. All had 'proscribed'(term used by Hans Blix) equipment, and records of activitied that should have been declared, but weren't.

interviewer: . You had rocket propellants, correct?

KAY: Well, the rocket propellants are really an interesting story I'm surprised no one has picked up on. We have Iraqis now telling us that they continued, until 2001 or early 2002, to be capable of mixing and preparing Scud missile fuel. Scud missile fuel is only useful in Scud missiles, no other class of missiles that Iraq has. And yet Iraq declared that it got rid of all of its Scud missiles in the early 1990swhy would you continue to produce Scud missile fuel if you didn't have Scuds? We're looking for the Scuds.

Like the ones they fired at Kuwait? those ones they said they didnt have?

SNOW: What about the United Nations? There's some talk that the United Nations ought to handle weapons inspection. What do you make of that?

KAY: Well, I certainly — we've used and are using today former U.N. inspectors. But the idea of turning it back over to the U.N. just doesn't hold any credibility.

The U.N. has pulled essentially all of its staff out of Iraq because of two explosions. I've had teams attacked four times in September and four serious injuries. Every one of the people we have on the ground, including myself, is weapons qualified and routinely carries weapons. We operate in a very non-permissive environment.

Botulinum, a dangerous chemical indeed. I do hope there are enough people in US to realise that about EVERYONE can make themselves some. My friend has even made plans how to use botulin in case of war.

you can also make powerful explosives with household cleaners and pipes with nails. What other practical uses are there for Botulinum? Your point is irrellevant, and your friend is a little stupid unless he's some sort of biomechanical engineer and understands what he's messing with.

I think that 2 terms should be the limit of the Bush family.

Only if that applies to Clinton to keep Hillary out too.

azulmagia · Post by **azulmagia** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 10:45 pm

Yeah, like I'd believe any WMD evidence hunters in Iraq. Especially a Christians In Action WMD hunter.

Let's admit it. The Bush Administation had no case for a war. No WMD, no link to al-Qaeda/911, no nothing.

madmallard · Post by **madmallard** » Mon Oct 06, 2003 11:32 pm

. . .okay man. If you're going to discredit someone, you need to have something more substantial and comparative. Lacking that. . . .

Also, yes there were links to Al-qaeda in Iraq. Clinton spoke on it too, years before.

No, Bush did not make any direct link to 9-11 and Iraq.

but i guess if inspectors have no creditbility with you then the missles they were forbidden to have that they fired at kuwait after claiming they didn't have them just dont matter.

Propyro · Post by **Propyro** » Tue Oct 07, 2003 12:05 am

azulmagia wrote:Yeah, like I'd believe any WMD evidence hunters in Iraq. Especially a Christians In Action WMD hunter.

Let's admit it. The Bush Administation had no case for a war. No WMD, no link to al-Qaeda/911, no nothing.

sure he dose ... bush is the president of the united states ... there fore he can do whatever teh fuck he wants because almost no one has the balls to stand up to him and say no. why? becasue were all puppets on nice little strings ...

/2 cent political rant.

[/|\]

Simpi · Post by **Simpi** » Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 am

sixstop wrote: No, Bush did not make any direct link to 9-11 and Iraq.

No, I dont think he did. But are you familiar with so called 'mindfuck'?

It works like this. Once official/media sources* repeat certain phrases ( Iraq-Al-Qaeda link, Funding terrorism, WMD, Saddam, Terror, etc.) long enough, human mind starts to work with power of association.

Soon we have: Saddam = Evil = Link Al-Qaeda = Evil = terrorism = WTC.

Now, that is certainly an extreme example but it's without doubt been very succesful if you look at polls.

Before long you have opinions such as this: "The sponsor of Sept. 11 was Saddam Hussein. Ever since the Gulf War, he's been trying to get back at us. Maybe it was Osama bin Laden's people, but my feeling is it was Saddam Hussein behind it. He footed the money."

Spc. Clint Brookins

*I recommed you read transcript of State of the Union speech 2003.