dvd screenshots

Locked
User avatar
NicholasDWolfwood
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 8:11 pm
Location: New Jersey, US
Org Profile

Post by NicholasDWolfwood » Sun Sep 21, 2003 5:45 pm

post-it wrote:
dokidoki wrote:post-it: I don't know what you're talking about.
If you have built your computer correctly then the "Print Screen" button should work flawlessly - I've used it under Windows and Lenux; so I know it works when the computers they have built done correctly ^^
No, it shouldn't, unless you've got a video card that's 10 years old and doesn't use hardware video acceleration for all video playback.
Image

User avatar
post-it
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 5:21 am
Status: Hunting Tanks
Location: Chilliwack - Fishing
Org Profile

Post by post-it » Sun Sep 21, 2003 5:49 pm

mine say's ATI . date is 04/17/2003 - yup, that would be about 10 years old T_T in someones book !!!

trythil
is
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
Location: N????????????????
Org Profile

Post by trythil » Sun Sep 21, 2003 6:35 pm

post-it wrote:
dokidoki wrote:post-it: I don't know what you're talking about.
If you have built your computer correctly then the "Print Screen" button should work flawlessly - I've used it under Windows and Lenux; so I know it works when the computers they have built done correctly ^^
Unless you're using (1) special drivers, (2) a different capture program OTHER than the default Windows facility, or (3) no hardware acceleration, PrintScreen won't do anything.

None of those cases are the most common case, so you don't have much of an argument when saying "but it works in a properly configured system!" unless you want to prove that MOST computers are misconfigured (and then you'd just have a mess on your hands).

Windows captures via the GDI. (On a GNU/Linux machine, you can configure the same behavior.) The problem is that 99% of modern video cards do NOT use the GDI for video playback as it's just too slow; they take a different, more direct path.

Image

And I know for a fact that "regular" screen captures don't work to capture content being played using XFree86's Xv extension, on a FreeBSD, GNU/Linux, or any other UNIX installation. (They sometimes work when you use OpenGL acceleration, but most people don't, since Xv is usually superior).

Might work with some other X-server, but not the most common one.

User avatar
post-it
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 5:21 am
Status: Hunting Tanks
Location: Chilliwack - Fishing
Org Profile

yup - OpenGL . gotta love it!

Post by post-it » Sun Sep 21, 2003 7:59 pm

? what's wrong with OpenGL ?
Image
if it were not
Image
for it, then
Image
this wouldn't
Image
have been subbed T_T

trythil
is
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
Location: N????????????????
Org Profile

Post by trythil » Sun Sep 21, 2003 8:31 pm

Did you read my post?

More importantly, what do all those screenshots and subbing have to do with anything?

I said that OpenGL output can sometimes be captured using "regular" screenshot methods on XFree86 -- a very specific case that I threw in for the heck of it. However most hardware-accelerated video playback is done via hardware overlaying and cannot be captured using said "regular" methods. Programs like SmartCapture can capture that data, but not Windows' built-in screenshot facility, which is what you said would work.

User avatar
post-it
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 5:21 am
Status: Hunting Tanks
Location: Chilliwack - Fishing
Org Profile

Post by post-it » Sun Sep 21, 2003 8:39 pm

erps!

sorry; it's always worked for me and its one of the first things I check for when
Ibuy a new Capture Card :oops:

User avatar
KillDieMurder
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:06 am
Location: Some here, some there...
Org Profile

Post by KillDieMurder » Mon Sep 22, 2003 10:50 am

I either use virtualdub or ctrl+i in windows media player to get DVD screenies.
FF6 AMV | Max Payne 2 Vid | End of eva
If my life were a video game, Pop-Tarts would give me full health.
Image

Locked

Return to “Video & Audio Help”