Does uncompressed video have an associated colorspace?

Locked
User avatar
koronoru
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 10:03 am
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Org Profile

Post by koronoru » Thu Jun 05, 2003 11:50 am

the Black Monarch wrote:Dude... turning 30 frames per second into 60 half-frames per second is NOT compression. Nothing is being compressed. Nothing is smaller after interlacing than before. The same amount of data is being used to describe the picture.
With anime (which starts out at a lower frame rate anyway, typically 12fps), that's true. That's not the situation for which interlacing was invented, though. Interlacing was invented for live-action television, where the cameras take 60 samples per second (in order to reduce the flicker seen at low progressive refresh rates) and the signal only contains half the information from each one. It's not turning 30 into 60; it's turning 60 into 30, by throwing out half of each captured image. In a really real interlaced television signal, field 2 is not the second half of the same picture you saw in field 1; it is the second half of a picture that comes 1/60th of a second after the picture you saw half of in field 1. The pictures change with every field, and you only get to see half of each one.

That could be legitimately described as a primitive form of lossy compression, although to do so is pretty misleading in the AMV context because it makes it sound like the "interlacing" we might do on a computer (which involves re-ordering the data without throwing any out) somehow reduces the amount of data sent. When we deal with anime, there are far fewer than 60 picture updates per second, so we see each one in several fields, and interlacing doesn't throw out any data.

User avatar
Tab.
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:36 pm
Status: SLP
Location: gayville
Org Profile

Post by Tab. » Thu Jun 05, 2003 2:51 pm

thank you koronu

as for YUV I wasn't pointing it out to make it look like you were arguing it with me, I was pointing it out as a correlation to interlacing as compression since they're both different from the terms we think of compression in.
◔ ◡ ◔

User avatar
the Black Monarch
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 1:29 am
Location: The Stellar Converter on Meklon IV
Org Profile

Post by the Black Monarch » Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:31 am

koronoru wrote:In a really real interlaced television signal, field 2 is not the second half of the same picture you saw in field 1; it is the second half of a picture that comes 1/60th of a second after the picture you saw half of in field 1. The pictures change with every field, and you only get to see half of each one.
:shock: :?: :shock: :?: :shock: :?:

TV cameras shoot at 60 frames per second?

:?: :shock: :?: :shock: :?: :shock:

I find that hard to swallow...
Ask me about my secret stash of videos that can't be found anywhere anymore.

trythil
is
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
Location: N????????????????
Org Profile

Post by trythil » Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:38 am

the Black Monarch wrote: :shock: :?: :shock: :?: :shock: :?:

TV cameras shoot at 60 frames per second?

:?: :shock: :?: :shock: :?: :shock:

I find that hard to swallow...
No, and that's not what koronoru said. With an interlaced-scan NTSC device, you do sample a signal 60 times a second, but you don't get 60 full frames a second.

With interlaced NTSC, you split up each frame into two sets of fields, and you send each set of fields every 1/60th of a second. On an interlaced device this gives you the illusion of 30fps motion.

User avatar
the Black Monarch
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 1:29 am
Location: The Stellar Converter on Meklon IV
Org Profile

Post by the Black Monarch » Mon Jun 09, 2003 6:52 am

That's the way I thought it worked, but that's not what he said.
Ask me about my secret stash of videos that can't be found anywhere anymore.

User avatar
Tab.
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:36 pm
Status: SLP
Location: gayville
Org Profile

Post by Tab. » Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:31 pm

try, no, it gives the illusion of 60fps motion and 480 lines of vertical resolution, which is what my point was the entire time. It's really 60fps of whatever x 240.
◔ ◡ ◔

User avatar
the Black Monarch
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 1:29 am
Location: The Stellar Converter on Meklon IV
Org Profile

Post by the Black Monarch » Mon Jun 09, 2003 5:37 pm

Tab. wrote:whatever x 240.
720.

dumbass nonsquare pixels.
Ask me about my secret stash of videos that can't be found anywhere anymore.

User avatar
Tab.
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:36 pm
Status: SLP
Location: gayville
Org Profile

Post by Tab. » Mon Jun 09, 2003 9:48 pm

I said whatever because we're talking interlaced material, which could be broadcast (400some x 240/480), DVD (720 x 240/480), vhs (300some x 240/480), svcd/cvd (480/352x240/480) etc
◔ ◡ ◔

User avatar
JCD
Lord of the Dance
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 3:42 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by JCD » Tue Jun 10, 2003 1:54 am

back to this...
the Black Monarch wrote:Yeah, but It's better than going through YV12 (DVD) -> YUV (Huffy) -> RGB (Premiere) -> YUV (huffy) -> RGB (Vdub) -> YUV (distro) bullshit. That's what I mean by avoiding SOME conversions.
just export uncompressed out of premiere and everything will be fine and you won't lose quality.

User avatar
Tab.
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:36 pm
Status: SLP
Location: gayville
Org Profile

Post by Tab. » Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:43 am

You only need one back and forth color conversion, and that's because of premiere's dumb ass. DVD (YV12) -> Premiere (RGB) -> Huffyuv (RGB) OR libavcodec's huffyuv / vble (yv12) -> distro codec (yv12)
◔ ◡ ◔

Locked

Return to “Video & Audio Help”