Quick codec comparison

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:47 pm

I finally put it up ~_~

http://digitalinsanity.ath.cx/~tab/divx ... mpare.html

the click compare test is actually a better way to compare them than the table :\

its not a perfect codec shootout since the source wasnt dvd but its not a bad indication of the codec's performance

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:53 pm

oh yeah, theyre all at 1 mbps :| forgot to mention

trythil · Post by **trythil** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 5:02 pm

Ah, so that's why you keep pushing RV9...

Though, what settings did you use for each encoding? I'd assume that they were all set to produce the highest quality file possible, but I was wondering if you could provide further specifics.

trythil · Post by **trythil** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 5:04 pm

RadicalEd0 wrote:oh yeah, theyre all at 1 mbps forgot to mention

Bah, you answered my question before I posted it

AbsoluteDestiny · Post by **AbsoluteDestiny** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 6:31 pm

Um... why is there all that chroma bleeding on the (mainly left) edges of the divx5, xvid and rv9 images?

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 6:36 pm

I do not know

lets pretend thats not there >_>

Brolli411 · Post by **Brolli411** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 7:46 pm

Is there any difference between 3Vid, and 3ivx?

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 7:49 pm

link, because I've never heard of 3Vid

Brolli411 · Post by **Brolli411** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 7:51 pm

Arg, I can't type... Between 3viX and 3ivx

Sorry.

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 7:53 pm

argh.. fuck >_<
I thought it was 3vix
why....

I'm not editing the html.. just deal with it ~_~