PC..

Locked
User avatar
Kashinoda
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 2:35 am
Org Profile

PC..

Post by Kashinoda » Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:10 am

Dont flame me, i bloody searched ages to find any similar topics and had no luck lol.

Any how, my PC good enough to edit vids etc?(adobe prem 6.5)

AMD Athlon 1GZ
480MB RAM
32MB GFX CARD
...all you need to know

Thanks in advance (w8s for flame)
Image

User avatar
Mr Pilkington
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:10 pm
Status: Stay outa my shed
Location: Well, hey, you, you should stop being over there and be over here!
Org Profile

Post by Mr Pilkington » Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:16 am

U can edit using any system you want, it's just how long it will take you to perform certain actions.

User avatar
FurryCurry
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 8:41 pm
Org Profile

Post by FurryCurry » Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:17 am

Sure it is, just make sure you have plenty of disk space available.

User avatar
Kashinoda
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 2:35 am
Org Profile

Post by Kashinoda » Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:17 am

Well yeah I used to use 330MHZ 32 RAM to do videos,(omg too slow) just wonderin if this is fast-ish and wont encounter many errors (win xp pro)
Image

User avatar
RadicalEd0
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 2:58 pm
Org Profile

Post by RadicalEd0 » Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:21 am

yeah I not only edit but encode shit all the time and I'm on athlon 1ghz 384 ram and a 16 mb video card
NMEAMV: PENIS
NMEAMV: IN
NMEAMV: YO
NMEAMV: MIXED
NMEAMV: DRINK

User avatar
FurryCurry
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 8:41 pm
Org Profile

Post by FurryCurry » Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:29 am

I doubt it will feel extremely zoomy, but it shouldn't try your patience too much.

Don't worry yourself about how much ram you use for graphics. As long as you have enough to display 32 bit 2d graphics at the resolution you wish to use (within reason, of course, 1600x1200 should be no problem) more graphics memory won't speed anything up, unlike 3d gaming applications.

It sounds like you have 512 megs of ram, and are using 32 of it for shared graphics memory. If you run a fairly normal screen resolution like 1024x768, or 1280x960, you might get a tiny boost by cutting back the memory assigned to display use to 16mb. That should free up those extra 16 megs for Premiere to hog. ^^;

No big deal, though.

User avatar
Kashinoda
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 2:35 am
Org Profile

Post by Kashinoda » Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:34 am

FurryCurry wrote: It sounds like you have 512 megs of ram, and are using 32 of it for shared graphics memory. If you run a fairly normal screen resolution like 1024x768, or 1280x960, you might get a tiny boost by cutting back the memory assigned to display use to 16mb. That should free up those extra 16 megs for Premiere to hog. ^^;

No big deal, though.
Yeah I alredy cut it back from 64 and I dont play any games, thanks for the tip.
Image

User avatar
NicholasDWolfwood
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2002 8:11 pm
Location: New Jersey, US
Org Profile

Post by NicholasDWolfwood » Sun Jan 05, 2003 1:22 am

I use 1280x1024, have 32MB of onboard video memory, and have 512MB of RAM on an Athlon XP 1700+ (1.47GHz, running at 1.4GHz) so if I can edit on this, you should be able to edit on your system. Hell, Premiere was really fooking slow on my 450MHz AMD K6-2 with 256MB of PC133 RAM. :P
Image

User avatar
Gottaname
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 7:25 am
Location: Singapore
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Gottaname » Sun Jan 05, 2003 5:29 am

Well, if you want something cheap but lightning fast... You can get something like mine, a Intel Celeron 1.7GHZ, 256MB RAM, Geforce 4 128MB and a 120GB hard drive...

User avatar
AbsoluteDestiny
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2001 1:56 pm
Location: Oxford, UK
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by AbsoluteDestiny » Sun Jan 05, 2003 7:47 am

All of my videos to date have been made on a machine with a Duron 800, if that's any consolation.

Locked

Return to “Video & Audio Help”