Ashton wrote:Its stuff like this that is leading me to believe that there is a deep rift being driven into the comunity, dividing all of the active members into two groups: the older generation that is already well established and has been doing their thing "since before most of you cared" type, and the kind that joined after seeing this first groups work and deciding to give it their own go. I would say that I definately fall into this second group, but it seems that some people (especially from the second group) have decided to demonize the other group.
That's bull... I was in DDR2 and was sworn at by Tommy in his recent rant, yet he's made videos for longer than I have. It's not a matter of old vs new schoolers.
I've only ever experienced courtesy and mutual appreciation in real life amongst amv makers but there are a lot of people who presume that others are stuck up, arrogant, etc etc. If that's what people want to think, then that's their own problem but having met all these people I know it's not generally the case.
I was open to Tommy's DDR ideas until he started calling everyone names and being generally insulting to people who worked incredibly hard. The fact is that everyone on this project worked damn hard within their own work restrictions to get videos made... and I for one think they came out pretty well. There might not be the best videos inthe amv world ever, but given crappy songs and tricky deadlines they were cool videos.
Working on the DDR project is not some amv equivalent of the knights of the round table with King Demoss. The first project was done by friends, but that's natural - especially given the size of the amv community at the time. The second one was done by those who worked their hardest on the first one and some others that were recruited because they were trusted to do a good job - this is especially true of the backup creators who had to fill in at the very last minute and even Tommy admitted that the Turboneko guys and Mike and Meri did great jobs.
Next year's DDR contains the most reliable from ddr2 and 9 lucky lottery winners. It's not elitist, it's just practicality - you cant have people not make their video when you've got to show it to hundreds of people the next day.
As for "Thou shalt not do a DDR project", let's not have this discussion again. It was never that black and white - Tommy chose a one that was already being worked on for direct competition and it fell through due to lack of support and organisation. Given the sucess of projects such as NES and Improbable I can only presume that this failure was due to either a lack of organisational skills or not eeryone agreeing that having a competing project is a good thing. Certainly the amv community is perfectly happy to enrole in exciting new projects - it's nothing to do with some fantastical heirarchy.
In the end (no pun intended), Tommy is entitled to his opinion but I wont sit around and read how, because things havent gone his way, that this suddenly turns the hard working amv makers in the DDR project into bad elitist scum. Not only is it plain incorrect but it insults a lot of very good natured people who just make some videos for fun.
If there is any divide in the amv world it is this one: There are those who think amv making is a popularity contest and there are those who don't. Having met the makers of the ddr projects, I can definitely put them in the latter.