Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
- Beowulf
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
- Location: in the art house
- Contact:
Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u54JKBqQvCo
For those aspiring young film maker's that hang out here and have heard about the Mark II: GET ONE. This is a test I filmed with an $80 lens and 100 watt light bulbs. Look at that 1080p!
For those aspiring young film maker's that hang out here and have heard about the Mark II: GET ONE. This is a test I filmed with an $80 lens and 100 watt light bulbs. Look at that 1080p!
- Pwolf
- Friendly Neighborhood Pwaffle
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 4:17 pm
- Location: Some where in California, I forgot :\
- Contact:
Re: Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
"My thing just crashed"Beowulf wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u54JKBqQvCo
For those aspiring young film maker's that hang out here and have heard about the Mark II: GET ONE. This is a test I filmed with an $80 lens and 100 watt light bulbs. Look at that 1080p!
LMAO
Anyway, yea, 5d mkii is :O 7d does a decent job as well.
- Warheart
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:58 am
- Status: Immersed
- Location: In Fiction
- Contact:
Re: Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
Actually most recent DSLRs that don't even have FF can do nearly as good, the Pentax K7, the D700, K-x, D90, 550D and so on, the actually advantage of the Mk II is the FF which is best to be used for Photography. 
But the good thing is that it got way cheaper after the IV came out.

But the good thing is that it got way cheaper after the IV came out.

- Beowulf
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
- Location: in the art house
- Contact:
Re: Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
They can all do *nearly* as good, but it depends on what your definition of nearly is. I've played around with a D90 and the movie mode is an after-thought. The Mark II gives you the biggest DoF options, and the best iso performance for a camera under $5,000. That test footage was shot at 1600 iso! The Nikon for example, is pushing it at 800. There's a great camera shoot-out video, where they put a bunch of DSLRs through testing and the 5D wins all of them (in its class of course). The 7D looks *nearly* as good, but not as good.
I know you're basically paying an extra thousand dollars for better iso performance and DoF, but its that important to me.
As far as film making goes, the mark II is the only guy in town, and has been for a year now. I can't speak for Pentax, but I know that Nikon has nothing to compare to it. Its the best camera to make movies/narratives with in its price class.
I know you're basically paying an extra thousand dollars for better iso performance and DoF, but its that important to me.
As far as film making goes, the mark II is the only guy in town, and has been for a year now. I can't speak for Pentax, but I know that Nikon has nothing to compare to it. Its the best camera to make movies/narratives with in its price class.
- dreamawake
- Prodigal Pen-Throttle
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:50 pm
- Status: NMEs Prodigy
- Location: Nowheresville, NJ
- Contact:
- Brad
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2000 9:32 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
Good. Now go make shit :O
- Pwolf
- Friendly Neighborhood Pwaffle
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 4:17 pm
- Location: Some where in California, I forgot :\
- Contact:
Re: Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
fixed.Brad wrote:Good. Now go make cool shit :O
- Brad
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2000 9:32 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
Lets start him off with attainable goals.
- requiett
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 6:49 pm
- Location: Alaska
Re: Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
Damnit, this or the Scarlet? 

- Beowulf
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
- Location: in the art house
- Contact:
Re: Canon 5D Mark II HD footage test
Scarlett is gonna be a much better camera, but its going to be probably twice the price, and it hasn't come out yet. It doesn't take stills as far as I know, so consider that.