It's a matter of size...

Nya-chan Production · Post by **Nya-chan Production** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:42 pm

*thinks about doing that 64*48 vid some more*

BasharOfTheAges · Post by **BasharOfTheAges** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:48 pm

Pwolf wrote:
BasharOfTheAges wrote:I'll usually watch new vids on my HDTV as well... I judge them (for quality) based on that and my 1680x1050 monitor resolution.
That's ridiculous as anything short of 720p will look sub par. Not to mention a lot of older shows aren't very crisp to begin with.

With the right settings on the TV (and decent cleaning/compression), you'd be surprised at how good things look.

Chiikaboom · Post by **Chiikaboom** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:05 pm

I dont care if its 640x480, 320x240, or even 50x50. As long as i can see what is going on in the video i dont give a crap if the visual quality isnt ~flawless~.

Nya-chan Production · Post by **Nya-chan Production** » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:42 pm

Chiikaboom wrote:I dont care if its 640x480, 320x240, or even 50x50. As long as i can see what is going on in the video i dont give a crap if the visual quality isnt ~flawless~.

50x50 =/= dividable by 16

That's the only thing that stops me from making 16x9 vid ATM :<

OropherZero · Post by **OropherZero** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:23 am

within the next 12 months 1280 x 720 will be the next one. Then within another 12 months from then 1920x1080, dun dun dun =O

Pas · Post by **Pas** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:38 am

Otohiko wrote:As the thread title suggests, this obsession is indeed of truly phallic nature/proportions, IMHO. I don't really give a damn. I even watch a fair amount of video from streaming sites on full-screen and frequently find it tolerable. I'm much more interested in substance of content - though I will appreciate good video quality, it's not an overriding concern that will spoil the experience for me. In the same vein, I still adore many old movies that survive today in jerky, poor-colour film copies - and would watch them over crappy HD blockbusters any freaking day.

x2 on this, couldn't have put it better myself

Pwolf · Post by **Pwolf** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:51 am

BasharOfTheAges wrote:
Pwolf wrote:
BasharOfTheAges wrote:I'll usually watch new vids on my HDTV as well... I judge them (for quality) based on that and my 1680x1050 monitor resolution.
That's ridiculous as anything short of 720p will look sub par. Not to mention a lot of older shows aren't very crisp to begin with.
With the right settings on the TV (and decent cleaning/compression), you'd be surprised at how good things look.

Of course, but you can't expect everyone to spend the time to clean their source. I don't clean my source, it's a fruitless action that can take away from the older feel of some older shows. In fact, I would judge poorly on a video where the editor cleaned their source. The only time I would is if I want to kick up the res to match the other sources i'm using.

What i'm trying to say is, even if you have the nice hdtv (which I do), why the hell would I want to watch an amv on it and judge it's quality based on what i'm seeing from the TV? Thats like saying the video quality on a dvd looks like shit because it doesn't look HD on my HDTV. The only time I should be watching an amv on an hdtv, and judging it's quality as such, is when the video itself is of HD source and resolution. Only then can I accurately make an assessment as to it's quality.

Its stupid cause you are going to see artifacts, no way around it and no matter how good your cleaning and compression is (talking standard dvd resolution on a 720p+ hdtv). Until we are editing with HD footage for every video, using an HDTV as a source of judging quality is, in my opinion, ridiculous and frankly, the opinion of anyone who does do that will hold no weight due to the clear over zealous expectations which they themselves probably don't hold true.

Knowname · Post by **Knowname** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:12 am

first of all I note the age of the video so yeah...

but as for being perterbed?? ?? why? do you get perterbed at akira for not being hd?? seriously. get off your high horse for a second.

Taokato · Post by **Taokato** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:51 am

i dont care in which res the AMVs are O=
but I prefer watching amv's in 848x480 and it's not because of it's a standart. It's just a habit.

ngsilver · Post by **ngsilver** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:08 am

if I'm not looping vids on my TV I'm watching them on my PC, at a lower res then they usually are so they fit in the open space between my main window and the IRC window. Beyond that first run through of a video I rarely ever watch it at full quality again so really I don't care so much. I've got quite a few < 80x80 realmedia vids that I still loop to this day.

So yeah, I could care less most of the time. Only when I'm planning on showing vids at cons on a huge screen do I usually care about the res and fps, and even then it doesn't matter as much, since I've yet to goto a con that could handle true HD res.

AnimeMusicVideos.org

It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...

Re: It's a matter of size...