#amv-review log - Because Kio can't figure out cut 'n paste

x_rex30 · Post by **x_rex30** » Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 am

I really wanted to read all that im stuff, I really did, but I couldn't get myself to read beyond a few sentences.

Maybe if yall discussing stuff with audio involved, that would be cool. Do a IM with mics.. honestly. I rather people try to be funny through a mic than through text. I find it more entertaining.

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Wed May 07, 2008 11:31 am

x_rex30 wrote:
Maybe if yall discussing stuff with audio involved, that would be cool. Do a IM with mics.. honestly. I rather people try to be funny through a mic than through text. I find it more entertaining.

It's funny, when Quadir got onto skype with a bunch of us after a review session, some people said they preferred him that way

It would be a different kind of review, to be sure.

Niotex · Post by **Niotex** » Wed May 07, 2008 12:42 pm

Otohiko wrote:
x_rex30 wrote:
Maybe if yall discussing stuff with audio involved, that would be cool. Do a IM with mics.. honestly. I rather people try to be funny through a mic than through text. I find it more entertaining.
It's funny, when Quadir got onto skype with a bunch of us after a review session, some people said they preferred him that way

It would be a different kind of review, to be sure.

I'm down with it =|

quadir · Post by **quadir** » Wed May 07, 2008 2:08 pm

x_rex30 wrote:I really wanted to read all that im stuff, I really did, but I couldn't get myself to read beyond a few sentences.

Maybe if yall discussing stuff with audio involved, that would be cool. Do a IM with mics.. honestly. I rather people try to be funny through a mic than through text. I find it more entertaining.

Here's a perfect example of the real reason posting logs is a bad idea, that people will see a huge log and assume it's case closed. It's not. You can continue the discussion, and you're supposed to show up next week damnit.

DriftRoot · Post by **DriftRoot** » Thu May 08, 2008 2:26 pm

One problem with audio chat is that the loudest voices easily drown out the quieter ones. In IRC that doesn't happen (or rather, you type in caps too much and you get kicked out). It's a more level playing field. It's also less intimidating, for a variety of reasons.

"Live" chat is also even MORE susceptible to un-thought out discussion. At least with IRC one has (theoretically) time to think carefully about what one wants to say, figure out the best way to say it and revise what they say if it doesn't come out right.

Erm, oh yeah, and online conferencing is almost impossible for poor souls on dial-up.

Don't get me wrong, I have usually have a great time in live chat, but I'm not sure that's the best setting for #review.

JaddziaDax · Post by **JaddziaDax** » Thu May 08, 2008 4:21 pm

In any setting you have the capacity to think before you speak. If you don't then it's technically your own fault.

x_rex30 · Post by **x_rex30** » Thu May 08, 2008 6:53 pm

DriftRoot wrote:One problem with audio chat is that the loudest voices easily drown out the quieter ones. In IRC that doesn't happen (or rather, you type in caps too much and you get kicked out). It's a more level playing field. It's also less intimidating, for a variety of reasons.

"Live" chat is also even MORE susceptible to un-thought out discussion. At least with IRC one has (theoretically) time to think carefully about what one wants to say, figure out the best way to say it and revise what they say if it doesn't come out right.

You can have both, post an audio version/text version together. Hell sounds more fun to me if you do it that way. Those who want to chat about it on a mic, those who don't use text. Seems easy enough.

Fall_Child42 · Post by **Fall_Child42** » Thu May 08, 2008 6:55 pm

JaddziaDax wrote:In any setting you have the capacity to think before you speak. If you don't then it's technically your own fault.

What if you had suffered brain damaged and your inhibitors, prefrontal cortex I believe...

Fall_Child42 · Post by **Fall_Child42** » Thu May 08, 2008 6:57 pm

Fall_Child42 wrote:
JaddziaDax wrote:In any setting you have the capacity to think before you speak. If you don't then it's technically your own fault.
What if you had suffered brain damaged and your inhibitors, prefrontal cortex I believe...

I apparently have damaged my Language production centers ...

What that is supposed to say is
"What if you had suffered some sort of brain trauma and damaged the sections dealing with inhibitions, which, I believe is the prefrontal cortex"

JaddziaDax · Post by **JaddziaDax** » Thu May 08, 2008 7:26 pm

Todd, that has nothing to do with the setting, but the mental damages/issues that one might have.