I'm building a new PC

Topics not related to Anime Music Videos
Post Reply
User avatar
Beowulf
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
Location: in the art house
Contact:
Org Profile

I'm building a new PC

Post by Beowulf » Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:25 pm

Simple question: AMD or Intel?

I've been an AMD man my entire life, but EVERYONE says that the Quad core intel blows AMD out of the water. Is this true? I'm going for performance strictly, I don't care that AMD is universally cheaper.

I'm building a quad core rig. Does anyone have an expert opinion? Are there any mega new chips coming out soon? Is the timing right?

love,
julian

User avatar
dwchang
Sad Boy on Site
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 12:22 am
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: I'm building a new PC

Post by dwchang » Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:33 pm

Beowulf wrote:Simple question: AMD or Intel?

I've been an AMD man my entire life, but EVERYONE says that the Quad core intel blows AMD out of the water. Is this true? I'm going for performance strictly, I don't care that AMD is universally cheaper.

I'm building a quad core rig. Does anyone have an expert opinion? Are there any mega new chips coming out soon? Is the timing right?

love,
julian
Intel.
...and you know my history and thus for me to say Intel means that well, they are better.

The AMD Quadcore is delayed and has a lot of problems while the Intel Quadcore has been out for quite some time. Ever since the "Core 2 Duo" family was introduced, Intel has (sadly) retaken the performance crown.

I actually built a Q6600 rig about 8 months ago and it's doing well. You can probably get a Quadcore for < $300 too, which answers the second question about timing. It's a good time to buy imo. DDR2 prices are also cheap.

I guess one could argue that DDR3 is coming and higher FSB, but those will be a lot of $$$ and you can build a Quadcore with DDR2 (800 mhz FSB) for < $1,000 nowadays.
-Daniel
Newest Video: Through the Years and Far Away aka Sad Girl in Space

User avatar
Beowulf
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
Location: in the art house
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Beowulf » Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:39 pm

Awesome, that answers that. Q6600 it is. I read on newegg that everyone overclocks theirs to 3Ghz :up:

User avatar
Koopiskeva
|:
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:31 pm
Status: O:
Location: Out There Occupation: Fondling Private Areas ..of the Nation.
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Koopiskeva » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:29 pm

I have a QX6800 and I cant get enough... I have the urge to go octo-core |:
Hi.

User avatar
OhmGautama
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: North Carolina
Org Profile

Post by OhmGautama » Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:54 am

The Q6600 comes in either the B3 or GO series, I would recommend the GO series as it is more ready-made to overclock.
"Freedom discovers man the moment he loses concern over what impression he is making or about to make"

User avatar
Zarxrax
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Zarxrax » Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:29 pm

Yeah, the Q6600 rocks. Make sure you get a good cooler for it though if you wanna overclock. I'm just using the standard fan that came with it, and I can only keep it stable up to 2.7ghz.

I think the big problem around this time though is what to do about ram. The whole deal with 32-bit vs 64-bit basically comes down to being a RAM issue. 32-bit windows cant really use more than about 3.2GB of RAM. 64-bit windows leads to, possibly, some compatibility problems. And I would recommend you stick to XP. I've been running Vista here for a few months now, and while its not horrible, there are times I wish I was still running XP instead.

User avatar
x_rex30
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2001 4:30 pm
Org Profile

Post by x_rex30 » Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:43 pm

This thread is epic. :up:

User avatar
BasharOfTheAges
Just zis guy, you know?
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 11:32 pm
Status: Breathing
Location: Merrimack, NH
Org Profile

Post by BasharOfTheAges » Thu Dec 27, 2007 5:27 pm

The only compatibility problems i've had with 64bit XP was with your x264 encoder zarx. (and some older abandoned software for my MP3 player). 64-bit XP is only windows server 2003 with XP visuals.
Anime Boston Fan Creations Coordinator (2019-2023)
Anime Boston Fan Creations Staff (2016-2018)
Another Anime Convention AMV Contest Coordinator 2008-2016
| | |

User avatar
Zarxrax
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Zarxrax » Thu Dec 27, 2007 5:32 pm

BasharOfTheAges wrote:The only compatibility problems i've had with 64bit XP was with your x264 encoder zarx. (and some older abandoned software for my MP3 player). 64-bit XP is only windows server 2003 with XP visuals.
Well, you have the issues with drivers needing to be 64-bit, and then there are problems with 32-bit and 64-bit stuff interacting with one another. For instance, I think a 64-bit video codec totally wont work in, say, a 32-bit version of premiere, or whatever.

User avatar
Zarxrax
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Zarxrax » Thu Dec 27, 2007 5:34 pm

BasharOfTheAges wrote:The only compatibility problems i've had with 64bit XP was with your x264 encoder zarx. (and some older abandoned software for my MP3 player). 64-bit XP is only windows server 2003 with XP visuals.
Oh, by the way, I think I fixed the problem with my x264 encoder, if you wanna hit me up for that. I'm still waiting around on the new visual studio to come out before I get back messing with any coding stuff though.

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”