The AMV theorum

CaTaClYsM · Post by **CaTaClYsM** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:37 pm

I speculate that the quality of an AMV is equal to the amount of time spent making - the amount of posts on the boards soemone has.

so to put it mathmaticaly
AMV TIME=z
POSTS=x
Qualtiy=y

z-x=y

so is this so mathmatical way to acuratley find the quality of a video? or am I just high?

mexicanjunior · Post by **mexicanjunior** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:43 pm

Huh?

The Wired Knight · Post by **The Wired Knight** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:45 pm

But what exactly does this number mean? And does this make my old videos worse even though I don't work on them but am still posting? Because after being on this board for two years that would make all my AMVs have a negative quality rating as well as a great many people here. Have you spent more than 600 hours on an AMV to keep a positive rating?

RichLather · Post by **RichLather** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:48 pm

Must be that there fuzzy math.

CaTaClYsM · Post by **CaTaClYsM** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:55 pm

Here is how my theory works, the amount of time spent denotes effort, and effort acounts for something, even if the person my lack skill, and how can someone be seriously working on an AMV if they are to busy spamming the boards, now see wired you have less posts than me, so your video's will have a smaller reduction because of it.

now lets look at my 2 older videos

I was spamming so there is a big reduction-
I finnished then in a day, not much effort

product, utter crap, and the people that had 3000 plus posts didn't even MAKE AMV's there wre here only to spam.

anneke · Post by **anneke** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:56 pm

I have a video that I spent only 3 hours on and yet it has won an award. Another video I spent 3 hours on almost won an award as well.

That is ofcourse using awards as a basis of if a video is good, and thus being of quality.

Anneke

Red Wolf · Post by **Red Wolf** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 5:29 pm

I meaausre my AMV time is second

Red Wolf · Post by **Red Wolf** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 5:30 pm

[edit]

I measure my AMV time in seconds

[/edit]

jonmartensen · Post by **jonmartensen** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 5:41 pm

Red Wolf wrote:I meaausre my AMV time is second

not quite up for going for first eh? haha no I saw your edit

I think the only way to tell if an AMV is good or not is to just watch it, the only thing you can kinda' use to decide if an AMV might or might not be good is previous work from the producer. If I've seen three good AMV's from one creator then I would think any new one they make will probably be good (maybe not as good as the previous work but still good)

CaTaClYsM · Post by **CaTaClYsM** » Wed Oct 30, 2002 6:25 pm

I didn't say there wouldn't be a small margin of error, or a few exeptions to the norm, but for the most part this is the closest thing to an acurate mathmatical mesurement in AMV quality.

AnimeMusicVideos.org

The AMV theorum

The AMV theorum

Nope won't work.