Improv MEP [Interest Gauge]

Discussion & organization of Multi-Editor Projects
Locked
User avatar
Ingow
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2002 10:52 am
Status: God Tier
Org Profile

Post by Ingow » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:27 pm

CrackTheSky wrote: If you're saying that the person whose turn it is to edit gets to choose how much they want to edit, that COULD work...my only fear is that based on what else you said, people would choose short tracks and all your fears about 30 seconds not being enough would be realized.
We could set a minimum of 30secs and a maximum of 1:30.
CrackTheSky wrote: My other concern is that, because of how this project works, much more than 30 seconds and it's going to start taking people too long to edit their tracks. And since quite a few people seem interested, at 10-20 editors in the project this is going to take a while to complete already with a one-week limit per track. Editors cannot start editing until the editor before them finishes, to prevent people from giving someone a crap song and then dropping themselves. The way this is set up, editors have to edit something before they can pass on their audio. More than one week or a week and a half per track and the time put into this'll add up quite a bit. I don't want to make people edit a 45-60 second track in a week if that's just something they can't do.
I don't really see why it has to be one week in that case. If there'd be like a list at the beginning making pairs on who gets what song everyone would be editing at the same time. And I don't see why a MEP that takes more than a week should be a problem considering the months all the others take. I know, it's good to see things finished the fastest way possible but 2 weeks for a track segment between 0:30 and 1:30 minutes should be doable as a main concept without taking too much time. I mean if I'd think of it myself even if I'd get a completely complex crazy techno beat audio track I could still decide whether or not I'd want to keep it down to 30secs and if I'd choose that I could spent 2 weeks on working on all the needed sync. And on the other hand slow songs that don't require much sync/editing would be pretty bad in 30seconds, because how much possible cuts are that in a drama video? Like 4, or something? In that case the person editing it could easily go ahead and edit 1:30 and that way both videos would balance each other out.

Of course the AMV Hell problem would return if we'd get 30secs tracks only in the end but chances would be higher that the finished project would have a lot more variety. Also, not every right song for this project can be cut into good 30seconds, if the editor could choose which part he could also cut out the part he feels best about editing to so that at least nobody would have to stick to the worst possible 30seconds of a song.
Image

User avatar
Fall_Child42
has a rock
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:32 pm
Status: Veloci-tossin' to the max!
Location: Jurassic Park
Org Profile

Post by Fall_Child42 » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:49 pm

I am So in.

So freekin' In.
Image

User avatar
NS
I like pants
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:05 pm
Status: Pants
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by NS » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:51 pm

I'm in.. More

User avatar
meleechampion
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 11:05 pm
Status: wtf is a jabber address
Org Profile

Post by meleechampion » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:52 pm

Letting the editor choose their ~30seconds in a forced song seems like a nice compromise, but wouldn't it defeat the purpose? The person before them will probably be like "thats not the part I wanted to see edited O:" and feel less attached to the project...

User avatar
NS
I like pants
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:05 pm
Status: Pants
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by NS » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:53 pm

Yah, Because in ever hard song to edit. There will most likely be a part in there that is just as Easy to edit.

User avatar
Minion
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:16 pm
Location: orlando
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Minion » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:54 pm

am interested.
KioAtWork: I'm so bored. I don't have class again for another half hour.
Minion: masturbate into someones desk and giggle about it for the remaining 28 minutes

User avatar
Fall_Child42
has a rock
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:32 pm
Status: Veloci-tossin' to the max!
Location: Jurassic Park
Org Profile

Post by Fall_Child42 » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:57 pm

Minion wrote:am interested.
We must have All of TIC
Image

User avatar
omegaevolution
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:46 pm
Location: ZOMG, THE OMEGA MOVIL!! =O
Org Profile

Post by omegaevolution » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:45 pm

lol just noticed this topic, anyway I'm interested but not sure yet :P. But I indeed have some instrumental songs that I would love to see edited with :D.
ImageImage
Image

User avatar
Bauzi
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:48 pm
Status: Under High Voltage
Location: Austria (uhm the other country without kangaroos^^)
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Bauzi » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:57 pm

To Ingow´s stuff:

He brought up some pretty good points that we (can I say we now or should I say Ben?) stick on.

All in all... It could turn out more nice if people just bring up some songs that are rare or not well known to edit with. Some treasures of music =P
You can find me on YT under "Bauzi514". Subscribe to never miss my AMV releases. :amv:

User avatar
Autraya
Zero Punctuation
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:52 am
Status: old
Location: Terra Australis
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Autraya » Sun Jul 08, 2007 8:04 pm

Fall_Child42 wrote:
Minion wrote:am interested.
We must have All of TIC
I'll share lockstocks case of beer with others at manifest if you manage to rope the others in... waait no IC's are going to Manifest... oh well tew bad
new banzors in the making :p

Locked

Return to “Multi-Editor Projects”