another term that could be tossed around is "anime-influenced" ...

Your interpretation is spot on, as that was exactly what I had in mind. As for abuse, the onus would entirely be on the coordinator (me) and the judges (of which there are usually 15+) jointly. Since the invokation of that clause would have to be agreed upon by so many people, is that clause really abuseable?Seijin_Dinger wrote:I dislike that caveat because it can lead to abuse. Im not saying it will be abused but can open the door to full on anime AMVs being dq'd for not "fitting the spirit" while also being able to override the anime to non anime ratio and allow 100% non anime videos in. This is a bad thing and I think that rule should be reconsidered.
When handling any issue, I present the issue to the judges along with my preliminary opinion and what the rules state on the matter. The judges then deliberate, and during that time I do not speak unless spoken to. Whatever the judges decide, that's the word.Shin-AMV wrote:Unless xStylus or another judge hasn't bullied the rest into following his opinion on all the videos, it should be fine.
i will go ahead and put Bending Inferno out there as the example since i'm tired of dancing around it.xstylus wrote:The overriding question to be asked when invoking the clause is "Does this meet (or not meet) the spirit of an AMV event, and is our event strengthened or weakened in admitting or rejecting it?" That's not a question asked trivially, and even Rider's vid would spark a vigorous debate as to whether it satisfies that metric.
i could imagine how the audience would react if The Legend of Korra, or Gargoyles, or ReBoot were to suddenly appear onscreen. people who attend anime conventions aren't strictly into anime only. no one is so narrow minded that they would deprive themselves of viewing a spectacular series just because it didn't fit the wikipedia definition of a specific genre. they would probably even enjoy a disney movie or two thrown in therethis one should have been one of the finals at Anime Expo 2012. It would had made it worth the unnecessary two hours of waiting in line for the tickets. When this was played during the pre-show of AMVs that did not make the cut, I actually thought they were playing last year's winners.
- misslauj
thanksif it hadn't been disqualified for not being anime then it most likely would have made finals. i was told it was favorited by the judges.
- Rider4ZMusicVideos
Really?! Disqualified because it was not a japanese animation?! That's messed up big time since it's as popular as any other japanese animation. LOL. Oh well, I would have voted for this had it been in the final.
- misslauj
xstylus wrote:When handling any issue, I present the issue to the judges along with my preliminary opinion and what the rules state on the matter. The judges then deliberate, and during that time I do not speak unless spoken to. Whatever the judges decide, that's the word.Shin-AMV wrote:Unless xStylus or another judge hasn't bullied the rest into following his opinion on all the videos, it should be fine.
As for judges bullying other judges, I can't recall any instances of that, and such individuals would be remembered and not invited back the following year.
Rider, the problem there is that it's an amv contest, not fmv contest. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with fmv contests; just that if it's a contest for anime music videos, then it should stick to being just anime. Popularity of the source is irrelevant. That being said, showing a non-anime music video in the pre-show just exacerbates the issue.Rider4Z wrote:i will go ahead and put Bending Inferno out there as the example since i'm tired of dancing around it.xstylus wrote:The overriding question to be asked when invoking the clause is "Does this meet (or not meet) the spirit of an AMV event, and is our event strengthened or weakened in admitting or rejecting it?" That's not a question asked trivially, and even Rider's vid would spark a vigorous debate as to whether it satisfies that metric.
the fact that during both preshows the audience cheered as soon as Bending Inferno began because they recognized it to be Avatar should answer your question. and it received plenty of applause so, yes they were happy to view it. and i received this comment from a random viewer only a few days ago:i could imagine how the audience would react if The Legend of Korra, or Gargoyles, or ReBoot were to suddenly appear onscreen. people who attend anime conventions aren't strictly into anime only. no one is so narrow minded that they would deprive themselves of viewing a spectacular series just because it didn't fit the wikipedia definition of a specific genre. they would probably even enjoy a disney movie or two thrown in therethis one should have been one of the finals at Anime Expo 2012. It would had made it worth the unnecessary two hours of waiting in line for the tickets. When this was played during the pre-show of AMVs that did not make the cut, I actually thought they were playing last year's winners.
- misslauj
thanksif it hadn't been disqualified for not being anime then it most likely would have made finals. i was told it was favorited by the judges.
- Rider4ZMusicVideos
Really?! Disqualified because it was not a japanese animation?! That's messed up big time since it's as popular as any other japanese animation. LOL. Oh well, I would have voted for this had it been in the final.
- misslauj
so you have to ask yourselves, is giving what the audience would enjoy more or less important than covering your hides over technicalities in the rules.
drewaconclusion wrote:Rider, the problem there is that it's an amv contest, not fmv contest. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with fmv contests; just that if it's a contest for anime music videos, then it should stick to being just anime. Popularity of the source is irrelevant.