OMG!! A G GUNDAM VID THAT ISN'T ABOUT DOMON X RAIN?!!

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:45 pm

SuperFusion wrote:
Warheart wrote:No actual sync, moving mouths and wmv with the usual shitty quality. I'm sorry but that wasn't good at all. You should read the guides and change your editing a bit.
Pointing out your synch for 1 (what else more do you want him to do? do one of those "00:00 - 00:20 - yeah this part failed badder than the rests" opinions.

He also pointed out mouth movement. He pointed out your bad quality. And referred you to the guides. Get to it, huh?

aesling wrote:Also, the internal synch could have used some work, since it seems to me that's pretty much what instrumental videos rely on. There was some internal synch, but not nearly enough. And between about 3:24 or so and 3:26, there were a buch of clips that didn't seem to sych to anything.

She's pointing out that she doesn't think you synched ENOUGH.

What else can these people tell you except try harder?

Again, pointing out TWO seconds, I guess it must be that I don't feel like EVERY SINGLE THING needs to be synched, and two seconds, I must've missed it.

And, the whole comments about the quality piss me off. Sorry, but they do. Nothing worse than a bunch of damn perfection Avi-loving fruitcakes who have to call perfectly DECENT quality SHITTY. Yeah, it wasn't the best, but it sure as HELL wasn't SHITTY. It was large screen, not a lot of pixellation. Yeah, it wasn't DVD quality, so sue me. And also the G Gundam DVDs aren't great quality either. I tried my best.

And about the synch, sorry they didn't like it, I tried hard on it, and I thought it worked. Must be because they're so used to the fancy effects for instrumentals. Oh well.

There was nothing wrong with the quality though.

temaranight · Post by **temaranight** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:48 pm

Cornwiggle wrote:Any others who want to jump on the "Flame my video" bandwagon?

They weren't flaming it, at least Warheart and Aesling weren't..they were offering constructive critisim that you obviously can't take. If anyone should be accused of flaming in this thread it would be you and your remarks to Warheart. It's obvious that unless someone likes your video, you're not going to listen to them.

On that note..I agree with Aesling as well. I can overlook the moving mouths to a degree, but you need to work on your synching. If you'd have synched alot more of the vid to the main guitar, for example..it would have looked alot better. Most of it just looked like random overlays to me. As far as pointing things out..Superfusion is right...I'd have most of your whole timeline on here as "This could have been syched to this..ect"

All in all..I think you need to take more time on your vids..maybe get a few beta testers who will tell you what they think..not what they think you want to hear. I'm not saying your vid was bad (gods know I've seen much worse) but it could use more work.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:51 pm

Well, at least it's getting attention now.

Well, sorry you didn't like the synch. But I really tried for a LONG time to do this, so even 9 years, I think it would have come out the same. But I'll work on it.

But the part with the overlays I was trying to create a certain mood with the clips. And yeah, I used WMM, so I couldn't really perfectly synch guitar solos or anything because there weren't really any "effects" (and I use the term lightly) to fit it, so I improvised.

Oh well, maybe we just like different stuff or have different tastes.

See? I don't mind negative comments just as long as they say what they didn't like about it. -_-

x_rex30 · Post by **x_rex30** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 3:57 pm

Cornwiggle wrote:See? I don't mind negative comments just as long as they say what they didn't like about it. -_-

Because I didn't like it isn't good enough.

It's bad enough when someone says positive comments and don't say what they like about it.

Bebop0083 · Post by **Bebop0083** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:00 pm

for people who are having trouble with the "quality" issue its not really his fault. ive used footage from G Gundam before and the R1 dvds have shitty quality. ive watched his vid and the quality is about the same as my G Gundam vid and my vid is in AVI format.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:05 pm

x_rex30 wrote:
Cornwiggle wrote:See? I don't mind negative comments just as long as they say what they didn't like about it. -_-
Because I didn't like it isn't good enough.

It's bad enough when someone says positive comments and don't say what they like about it.

No, not really. I guess you don't know me. I like to have comments, good or bad.

If you like it, awesome, stroke my ego.

If you hate it, cool, but tell me what you hated about it so
1. I can know to know how to fix it for later stuff

If I try my best, and someone says "Oh that sucked" I want to know what the hell was wrong with it, since it's good in my mind's eye.

I like comments for stuff I do. Yes, that's me. I can't change that.

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:05 pm

x_rex30 wrote:
Cornwiggle wrote:See? I don't mind negative comments just as long as they say what they didn't like about it. -_-
Because I didn't like it isn't good enough.

It's bad enough when someone says positive comments and don't say what they like about it.

And actually, I DO ask people what they liked about it, too.

Fall_Child42 · Post by **Fall_Child42** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:13 pm

Cornwiggle · Post by **Cornwiggle** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:16 pm

Fall_Child42 wrote:

Good for you, but I don't. I'm not going to continue any of this flaming or other stupid crap.

You don't like it, I'm sorry you don't, I tried.

If you like it, I'm glad I was able to give you some enjoyment.

So, sorry to ruin your plans, Fall_Child42

godix · Post by **godix** » Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:27 pm

Cornwiggle wrote:Any others who want to jump on the "Flame my video" bandwagon?

Well I was going to give it a pass but since you offered...

I haven't seen video quality like this since the last time I watched beastiality porn via real video (last week. Hey, it was a koran man screwing a blowfish, don't try tell me you wouldn't watch that shit). I spent most of the time going 'Is that a tit? Maybe it's a money shot? Oh, wait, nevermind, it's just some robot getting tentacle raped'. Learn how to do <a href="http://www.animemusicvideos.org/guides/ ... ression</a> for gods sake. I know it can be complex but get a nine year old to explain the words you don't understand, like 'compression' or 'video quality'.

The syncing looked like the lipsync on the old black and white godzilla movies. I could tell the intention for this to sync was there but it was so horribly off that I'm tempted to call over my friends so we have have a drunken evening of making fun of this video and playing grab dick. The only thing that seemed to really be in sync was the audiences groan of pain when they simutaniously realized the video was four agonizing minutes long.

Your editing looks like you opened WMM then let a cat tapdance on your keyboard and decided to save whatever random crap got entered. The only point of your editing that spoke to me was about 3/4 the way through when you show a guy pointing to a huge vagina like object which then breaks. I haven't given in depth analyzation to the symbolism of that sequence but it's clear you have a large fear of females and probably a bit of an oedipus complex as well.

I will give you high marks on effort. The video sucks warm cum out of a short straw but it's fairly clear you actually TRIED to make it good. Your colossal failure at making it good is much more about your lack of any talent or redeeming feature than it is a lack of effort.

Thanks for letting me jump on the 'Flame my video' bandwagon. Usually I don't get such kind, but misguided, offers.