
maybe the cuts sometimes are too long, but overall is nice
LittleAtari wrote:I'm happy to finally see it released. I love how all the subtle things in this video make it feel a lot different from the original by making a lot of things just look visually interesting. Congrats on finishing it.
Also, Niotex for most improved
It's on a winning streak since it's release in.. 2005?mirkosp wrote:VLC for Worst Playback Software VCA 2011.
I think you're going to have to ask that yourself.inthesto wrote:Okay, but where are the real JCAs?
Despite the tweaks to make it run smoother, there were issues with it locking up/skipping in VLC for multiple people. So it's still a fair warning regardless =]NS wrote:I used VLC and it worked fine.
I completely see what you're saying Todd and I agree a 100%. But the video is what it is a "remaster". So it's not like I'll be gutting 80+% and starting something new from scratch. Still glad that while it tasted somewhat the same, you still enjoyed it.Dr.Dinosaur wrote:In the end, though I still enjoyed the increased hotdog the second time around it was still, essentially, the same hot dog. I think I might have liked a sandwhich instead.
Was there need for bumping? Unless you mean "Bumping"ZephyrStar wrote:Bumping for the;*
Sorry you feel that way but see Todd's reply as well.ExSphere wrote:SameDr.Dinosaur wrote:sandwhich.
You're absolutely right I Indeed do mean Eidolon with that. And most people will recognize its similar usage from there. That aside I'm hoping that that will not be the only video you'll download [from me] this year.-Reda- wrote:YOU MEAN LIKE EIDOLON?2D DoF - The simple concept of attracting the focus of the eyes to a specific section of the screen by effectively creating a fake Depth of Field. This is something I have been experimenting with for a very long time now in my other unreleased projects.
Edit: Fucking awesome. Probably the only video I'll download this year too.
It is like it's listed everywhere a remaster. So getting your hopes up for something other then that is kind of silly imho. I see and agree with what you're saying based on the OP/ED. Problem being that remastering a OP/ED would be immensely silly. The pacing is something that stood out for me after I finished the video and uploaded it though. I guess one could say I was too focused to get it done to take a step back. And look at the global sequence rather then being strictly objective.x_rex30 wrote:Holy crap! It's been years!
I'll check it out!
Edit: Dang! Wish it felt more like a remake instead of a remaster. I liked the original as you know a lot and I also thought the visual quality was good as well. The feeling from beginning to end felt great from the original but this with it's intro and outro, it didn't really feel as much of a rush to watch. But it's cool that you used the HD footage and made it 60 fps, but I don't think it needed it. One thing that makes the whole 60 fps work with Nostromo is that he is the king at panning. If the video has a crap load of panning, and it's one of the main features for your video, then the 60 fps adds a crazy new feel. It also works great for some sped up scenes. This is just my opinion. It's nice though adding a new color to the mix with this remaster so I approve.
All cuts were made based on the original video created in 6 hours 5 years ago. I agree with some of the shots being way too long. In return I've tried to make those shots a little more visually appealing vs the original. But in the end I didn't want to stray from the original with dominant cuts like that.nihilant01 wrote:didn't see the original but this is not bad
maybe the cuts sometimes are too long, but overall is nice
Haze. wrote:Great shit, this one is a keeper.
![]()
Cenit wrote:Good work! Likes!
Glad to hear you all seem to enjoy it.Koys wrote:Neat
Real DoF > 2D DoF but its a nice inbetween step.Niwa wrote:Nice work Mitch![]()
I need to work on my DoF.
That's what I got from a fair amount of people. So that plus my own interest in wanting to experiment sort of kicked off this project to start with.Enigma wrote:Still one of the better Gits videos :O
I don't play warcraft..Neverend wrote:wow mitch!
Grejt!
2005 vs 2010. Remaster not Remake. I know its not a good excuse but that really is what your complaints boil down to.Bauzi wrote:The 60fps were enjoyable, but it's still an annoying syncfestival where you don't even try to match the main changes of the music.
3.5/5
I'm sorry?Arashinome wrote:WAHT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT, YOU CALL THAT AN ENDING MITCH? THIS IS TERRIBLE, BAD DUTCHMAN! BAD! 1/5 1/5 1/5 1/5 WAHT THE FUCK IM 12 AND WHAT IS THIS?