movie maker - loud and proud!

Arigatomina · Post by **Arigatomina** » Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:04 pm

Scintilla wrote:I <b>really</b> hope this wasn't meant to imply that everyone who uses expensive software is "elitist" and/or makes said assumption about conversion...

do you think wmv any time wmm is mentioned? if not, then you're not the subject here

Pyle · Post by **Pyle** » Thu Apr 08, 2004 2:56 pm

Arigatomyna wrote:
Scintilla wrote:I <b>really</b> hope this wasn't meant to imply that everyone who uses expensive software is "elitist" and/or makes said assumption about conversion...
do you think wmv any time wmm is mentioned? if not, then you're not the subject here

I've recievecd quite a few compliments on the format of my vids (which is WMV). Just click on the ones in my sig and you'll see.

Arigatomina · Post by **Arigatomina** » Thu Apr 08, 2004 4:23 pm

>.<

I *never* said wmv formatted videos couldn't be good quality. I said to automatically assume a video made in windows movie maker is going to be a wmv file is stupid. It was a comment on the wmm-wmv link - not on quality issues. A complaint against those people who think wmm users can't do the same conversions most Premiere users do. You know, the ones who take for granted that if you use wmm you automatically use wmv, quality not withstanding.

Maverick-Rubik · Post by **Maverick-Rubik** » Thu Apr 08, 2004 5:16 pm

The WMV9 codec for .avi is actually quite good. I used to use it for rips and clips before I had my new harddrive. You could get something almost as good looking as XviD at like a tenth the size.

I had 5 second clips at around 100-500 kb. But I've only used that for my Animix track... I use huffyuv for clips now.