Go powell!

This forum is for actual topics of discussion that do not fit the above categories.
Locked
User avatar
Omega Bahamut
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:34 pm
Location: Canada last time I checked..
Org Profile

Post by Omega Bahamut » Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:05 am

flint_the_dwarf wrote:I believe so. :?
Ok ill take your word for it if you seem to get your kicks out of pointing out my spelling mistakes. :roll:
I've got no soul to sell....
"What if bodies are just here to confirm our existance?"

User avatar
OmniStrata
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2001 4:03 pm
Status: Wealthy
Location: Chicago
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by OmniStrata » Mon Feb 10, 2003 12:27 am

I LIKE THIS THREAD!

^_^

User avatar
Mroni
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2001 5:08 pm
Location: Heading for the 90s living in the 80s sitting in a back room waiting for the big boom
Org Profile

Re: Woopsee...

Post by Mroni » Mon Feb 10, 2003 6:02 am

punistation wrote:
Mroni wrote:Today Colin powell gave our proof against Iraq. It's kind of hard to refute it.

"Citing the British dossier, entitled Iraq - Its Infrastructure of Concealment, Deception and Intimidation in front of a worldwide television audience Mr Powell said: "I would call my colleagues' attention to the fine paper that the United Kingdom distributed... which describes in exquisite detail Iraqi deception activities."

Channel Four News has learnt that the bulk of the nineteen page document was copied from three different articles - one written by a graduate student.

Even typographic mistakes in the original articles are repeated.

Number 10 says the Mukhabarat - the main intelligence agency - is "spying on foreign embassies in Iraq". The original reads: "monitoring foreign embassies in Iraq."

And the provocative role of "supporting terrorist organisations in hostile regimes" has a weaker, political context in the original: "aiding opposition groups in hostile regimes."



http://www.channel4.com/news/home/z/sto ... ssier.html


http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/0 ... ssier.html




...see, if ONLY these guys had spent some time making Cartoon Music Videos. They'd be hanging out here on their time off, and learn all about the unl33tness of swiping other people's footage without asking. :D


Kisses XXOOXX
Jen

Image

The british are kind of stupid they are sending a helicopter carrier to help us oh what good buddys they are!


Mr Oni
Purity is wackable!
"Don't trust me I'm over 40!"

User avatar
Lyrs
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 2:41 pm
Location: Internet Donation: 5814 Posts
Org Profile

Post by Lyrs » Mon Feb 10, 2003 9:16 am

MAS PRODUCTIONS wrote:
Lyrs wrote:I just love a good fanatical discussion.

Anyway, i'm all for war. Near 8 billion people, somebody needs to die and i mean die, not suffer or anything...just die for god sakes!

/end
But would you fight in that war?
I seriously would, just teach me how to use a tank.

/end
GeneshaSeal - Dead Seals for Free
Orgasm - It's a Science

User avatar
kthulhu
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: At the pony stable, brushing the pretty ponies
Org Profile

Post by kthulhu » Mon Feb 10, 2003 7:26 pm

Lyrs wrote:I just love a good fanatical discussion.

Anyway, i'm all for war. Near 8 billion people, somebody needs to die and i mean die, not suffer or anything...just die for god sakes!

/end
1. The world has slightly more than 6 billion people. Not anywhere near 8 billion, and thank God.

2. Actually, in much of the infantry combat these days, the goal is to seriously wound, not kill, an enemy. Why is this? Because a wounded soldier can require enemy resources to care for, and can also affect enemy morale. This probably part of the reason, besides recoil, fire control, and weight, that NATO countries (and other militaries) use weapons in .223 Remington caliber (which is practically just a slightly more powerful, centerfire, .22 caliber round - in other words, not terrifically powerful).
I'm out...

User avatar
jonmartensen
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 11:50 pm
Location: Gimmickville USA
Org Profile

Post by jonmartensen » Mon Feb 10, 2003 7:29 pm

I would design and build a shoulder mounted rail gun with a backpack power supply. :) :twisted: Let the vaporization begin
Image

User avatar
kthulhu
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: At the pony stable, brushing the pretty ponies
Org Profile

Post by kthulhu » Mon Feb 10, 2003 7:39 pm

Railguns don't vaporize, sir, they are theoretically designed to tear, or punch, holes in things with ultra high velocity slugs. Ideal ammunition for one would be made of depleted uranium (for maximum armor penetration), with a hollow point (to collect tissue or matter, and to also reduce over-penetration). Athough I don't think railguns would be practical (or possible) for infantry use.
I'm out...

User avatar
jonmartensen
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 11:50 pm
Location: Gimmickville USA
Org Profile

Post by jonmartensen » Mon Feb 10, 2003 7:57 pm

I do belive, that at the current velocity attainable by large (not quite tank mountable) railguns, that anything organic would be...splattered. Increase the width of the projectile and taper the end to a point, while travelling roughly 4 km/s, and you have one vaporized soldier.
Image

Locked

Return to “General Off Topic”